Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Minnesota Attorney General Refuses Pawlenty’s Request

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 09:58 AM
Original message
Minnesota Attorney General Refuses Pawlenty’s Request
To Challenge Constitutionality Of Health Reform
http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/04/06/swanson-wont-sue/

Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson (D) has rebuffed Gov. Tim Pawlenty’s request to challenge the constitutionality of health reform, and has announced that she will instead file a friend-of-the-court brief supporting the federal government. In a formal letter responding to Pawlenty’s request, Swanson defended the the new law:

Having carefully reviewed the applicable Supreme Court precedent and other legal authority, it is my legal opinion that health care — which comprises over one-sixth of our country’s economy — substantially affects interstate commerce. See Gonzales, 545 U.S. at 17 (noting that Congress has the authority to regulate even purely local activities if the local activities are prt of a “class of activities” that have a substantial affect on interstate commerce). The United States government has been involved for years in many aspects of health care, including Medicare and Medicaid, both of which were enacted in the 1960s, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, enacted in the 1970s, and the Public Helath Service Act, enacted in 1944.

Pawlenty said “he would file papers opposing the controversial bill, setting Minnesota up as one of several states where the political leadership is divided over the legality” of health care reform, Pioneer Press reports. In her letter, Swanson decried the partisan division over the lawsuits. “In states like Washington, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Colorado Democratic Governors have questioned the motives of the Republican Attorneys General who filed the lawsuit…in states like Georgia, Nevada, and Mississippi, Republican Governors have questioned the motivates of the Democratic Attorneys General who have not filed lawsuits,” the letter said.

Indeed, a growing number of Attorneys General are refusing to participate in the lawsuits, arguing that the effort would “waste taxpayer dollars on a political stunt.” Today, the St. Petersburg Times characterized Attorney General Bill McCollum’s efforts– he is leading the gang of 14 (perhaps 15) AGs — as a political stunt, saying “this is more about the Republican’s campaign for governor and rallying the party base than about sound constitutional reasoning.” The editorial pointed out that McCollum filed the suit in Pensacola instead of Tallahassee to “have the case heard by a judge appointed by a Republican president.” “This looks like judge shopping and offers further evidence that the lawsuit is more about Republican Party politics than constitutional principles,” the paper notes.


http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2010/04/05/swanson-healthcare/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Pawlenty REJECTED
More of this, please!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. She used Gonzales as precedent
so now we're cheering for neocon policies? :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Neocons also wipe their asses after shitting. Should we all stop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Heeeeeeeeeeeee.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. what a worthless analogy...thanks a pantload
:eyes:

So you're saying we should support fascism because we all defecate? Brilliant. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Does Timmy have a case?
How would this be better if Timmy were allowed to challenge the constitutionality of health reform?

I'm no fan of neocon policy, but I am a big fan of seeing Pawlenty booed off the stage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Pawlenty is finished, politically.
The Right thinks he's a RINO and the Left thinks, quite properly, that he's an idiot. He has no prayer of becoming a serious candidate for the Presidency, but is trashing Minnesota in an attempt to show what a "tough guy" he is.

Tim Pawlenty is a bona fide moron of the first water, and the end of his political career is a very welcome thing for Minnesotans. It should be welcome by the rest of the nation, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. My question is, how did he get into that office in the
first place? How was he elected? Minnesotans seem too smart to have voted him into office. Apparently not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. We have three way races between the DFL, Republican and Independence Party.
It was a third party candidate that syphoned off enough votes to give us Michele Bachmann.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. And in the past two governor races...
the Independence Party nominee was a former Democrat. Pawlenty won both of his terms because two Democrats split the vote against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Pawlenty has never had more than 45% of the vote in a statewide race
Twice the majority of Minnesotans have rejected him.

Minnesota really is becoming the poster state for IRV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. I hope it's becoming clear to Pawlenty that aside from a very small group of players who want to use
him, absolutely NO ONE respects him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. PHEWlenty lives up to his name.
this guy AIN'T even gonna get a nod for president why doesn't he just go away, mainly from here in Minnesota. He looks like a crook anyway. Course that could work for him, republicans love crooks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. AHHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAAAA!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC