spinbaby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:33 PM
Original message |
Spirit Airlines to charge up to $45 for carry-ons |
ProdigalJunkMail
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
<snip> Spirit CEO Ben Baldanza said having fewer carry-on bags will help empty the plane faster. He said the idea is to get customers to pay for individual things they want, while keeping the base fare low. </snip>
Having a bag is not something I WANT, you tool, it is something I NEED!
Good thing I do not, and now will not, fly Spirit.
sP
|
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Airlines are known for shockingly bad decision-making, but this takes the proverbial cake.... |
spinbaby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. They'll charge you to take that cake |
Dappleganger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. Actually it's not surprising at all if you know how Spirit does business. |
CynicalObserver
(157 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-06-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
17. Agreed, my first experience with their cancellation policy |
|
opened my eyes to the fact spirit makes predatory policies. $45 for a carry-on that by definition is much smallerthan checked baggage says a lot.
|
kestrel91316
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
12. +100000 - soon to be followed by news of their bankruptcy. |
TheMightyFavog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
15. Sounds like the kind of bullshit Ryan Air pulls over in Europe. |
|
Makes the worst low cost carriers here in the States look like a pleasure cruise by means of comparision.
|
rcrush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:39 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Its like they are daring people not to fly. |
Lance_Boyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:41 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I wonder if they also charge for checked baggage? |
|
On its face this seems like a boneheaded move, but if it gets people on and off the plane faster and/or raises revenue, maybe it will work out to Spirit's advantage. Reducing competition for scarce overhead space might make flying slightly less horrific.
|
ProdigalJunkMail
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. they charge for BOTH n/t |
uppityperson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. Yes, they charge for checked. Here's their link... |
|
http://www.spiritair.com/Policiesbags.aspx#BaggageFeesOnline: $19 1st, $25 2nd, $100 third @ airport: $25/25/100 Changing it later this summer,
|
devilgrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:42 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Airline travel has been a total joke since Ronald Reagan came in a FUCKED things UP! |
|
:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
|
Dappleganger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:47 PM
Response to Original message |
8. SPIRIT is a schiester airline anyway. |
|
They completely ruined a church trip I was on one time and we had to wait nearly a year to get a refund on our tickets due to problems which were THEIR fault. Don't be taken in by their 'deals', they are the worst of the worst.
|
sui generis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:51 PM
Response to Original message |
11. and that includes laptops? |
|
I'm going to invent and patent the laptop dinner jacket, just you wait and see. At least until they start charging us for wearing clothes.
|
dembotoz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message |
13. guess you should just let your little kids run naked and crap without a diaper |
|
perhpas a diaper bag would then be allowed.
|
ProdigalJunkMail
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. that's a hell of an idea |
|
I am going without my 'incontinence' clothing if ever I fly them...that'll fucking teach 'em!
sP
|
HuckleB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:58 PM
Response to Original message |
16. They don't fly anywhere near my home, so it's not an issue for me yet. |
|
Still, if they actually reduced airfare by $40, and still allow people to bring bags that fit under the seat in front of them for free, it doesn't seem that big of a deal. Then again, I'm weird. I wondered why the airlines didn't charge for big carry-on luggage instead of checked baggage in the first place.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:21 AM
Response to Original message |