|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
PADemD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-07-10 11:26 PM Original message |
Santorum in 2012? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-07-10 11:33 PM Response to Original message |
1. LOL! I'd love to see a Santorum-Palin ticket. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 09:27 AM Response to Reply #1 |
15. I'd love it too, although the two of them would be at each other's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WorseBeforeBetter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-07-10 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
2. Fecal Matter (or is it Man-on-Dog?) may run, but he stands no chance of winning. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bobbie Jo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-07-10 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
3. Obligatory Santorum family pic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MUAD_DIB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-07-10 11:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Dissapointment, fear, sadness... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-07-10 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
4. Please? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-07-10 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
5. Bob Dole should run again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MUAD_DIB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-07-10 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
6. Santorum always seems to have the expression that he just krapped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kievan Rus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-07-10 11:57 PM Response to Original message |
8. Rick, please run. It'd be a bigger landslide than either Johnson/Goldwater '64 or Reagan/Mondale '84 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 03:14 AM Response to Original message |
9. Santorum has been drooling for a year or so to run for president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
10. It's scary enough that Santorum actually sees himself as presidential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawaii Hiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 08:54 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. As far as Romney goes: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 08:56 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Yep. Sounds like just the sort of thing the GOP would do -- take |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftinOH (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
11. He can take the family fetus on the campaign trail with him: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sub Atomic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 09:08 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. That whole incident is so creepy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
16. Let the turd run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-08-10 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
17. Another one that I hope runs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-10 07:47 AM Response to Original message |
18. If it weren't so excruciatingly anti-Constitution, it would be fun to watch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC