Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MUST READ For Democrats -> Power Struggle: Inside The Battle For The Soul Of The Democratic Party

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 06:00 PM
Original message
MUST READ For Democrats -> Power Struggle: Inside The Battle For The Soul Of The Democratic Party
Edited on Thu Apr-08-10 06:01 PM by WillyT
Found this through OpenLeft as a MUST READ!

This is 10 pages long (20 or so when printed), but I've linked to it in all-in-one-page view.

Power Struggle: Inside The Battle For The Soul Of The Democratic Party
Ryan Grim and Arthur Delaney - HuffingtonPost
April 8, 2010

<snip>

Raúl Grijalva is sitting quietly with a few of his staffers at one end of the bar, a bottle of Bud and a shot of whiskey in front of him, while his fellow Democratic members of the House of Representatives roar in celebration at the other end. It's 1 a.m. Less than two hours earlier, after a 14-month battle, Congress approved comprehensive health care reform.

Joe Crowley, ascendant leader of the New Democrat Coalition, stands behind the bar, passing out beers to his colleagues -- Bart Stupak, Melissa Bean, Steve Driehaus, John Larson. Crowley owns the place, his six-foot-four frame and Tyrannosaurus head towering over the crush of members, staffers, reporters and regulars.

Grijalva is a regular. So much so that for weeks, a cartoon caricature of him hung on a wall by the front door: a shirtless Grijalva, at the beach, admiring a sandcastle he has built with Lynn Woolsey and Debbie Wasserman Schultz. None of them see the menacing gang of senators marching their way. In the unsubtle tradition of political cartoons, the sandcastle spells out PUBLIC OPTION. The cartoon, fittingly, has been taken down before tonight. "We're commiserating and celebrating," says Grijalva, whose mood is leaning heavily toward the former.

The Senate hooligans depicted in the cartoon had co-conspirators. Democrats in both chambers let the sand castle get smashed, each blaming the other. The Democrats celebrating their victory in the bar tonight are of a decidedly conservative variety, the result of a conscious strategy to move the party to the right in order to take back the House and pad the majority. They may be the ones partying, but it's Grijalva and his progressive allies who are picking up the tab.

Since 1995, members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus have collectively given $6.3 million directly to members of the Blue Dog and New Democrat coalitions, according to an analysis by the Huffington Post of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics. That's not an overwhelming sum when the average winning campaign nowadays costs more than $1 million, but it represents one-sixth of all giving from one faction within the party to another. It doesn't include the millions that progressives have given to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee -- rank-and-file members are supposed to cough up $150,000 every two years (though many miss that mark), committee chairmen $250,000 and up. The DCCC turns around and funnels that money to conservative Democrats in close races. Add to that the millions spent by organized labor and outside groups such as MoveOn.org, and it's clear that progressive donors have become major financial benefactors of the conservative Democrats who battled to undermine their agenda. "That tension exists a lot," George Miller says about the party's demand that progressives fund their intramural rivals. "That tension exists a lot. And it's real."

Democrats play it too safe, says Grijalva. "When I give my dues to the DCCC, or when you contribute to it, you have no distinction as to where your money is going to go. And it goes to front-liners and usually Blue Dogs and usually vote against our issues. And that's a real frustration. And usually, if there's a progressive running, it's the last consideration in terms of support," he says.

The Blue Dog and New Democrat coalitions emerged in the 1990s in the wake of the successful Republican campaign to take control of Congress, and have continuously expanded their membership ever since. The prototypical Blue Dog comes from a socially conservative, rural district; New Democrats are more likely to represent pro-choice bankers from the suburbs. Both groups offer automatic protection against accusations that their members are too liberal.
Story continues below

The money flows almost entirely in one direction: The conservative coalitions have given progressives less than $600,000. While Blue Dogs and New Democrats have each given their fellow travelers $2.4 million in the past 15 years, members of the much larger progressive caucus have helped each other to the tune of just $1.3 million.

Progressives have received very little return on their investment when it comes to important votes. The 34 Democrats who voted against the health care reform bill in March have collectively received $2.1 million from progressive members. More than half of that sum came in the past five years.

Grijalva is piqued that the caucus his fellow progressives helped create has now launched a pep rally in his low-key bar, which he discovered when he arrived in 2003 after searching for a stool safely outside the orbit of Washington's power center. His colleagues don't seem to notice the host's distress. Leaving the bar to shouts of "Crow-ley! Crow-ley!", the Queens congressman out of central casting barely acknowledges Grijalva. Other members give him cursory nods. He stays until after the lights come on -- last call. As the remaining reporters file out, Grijalva says he will begin the fight again tomorrow.

He'll have company. Organized labor, MoveOn.org and progressive members of Congress are increasingly breaking from the orbit of the White House and the Democratic establishment, beginning to take on the administration, build an independent infrastructure and back progressive primary challengers. Unions are working to groom progressive candidates in small, local races and, inside Congress, the progressive caucus -- after years of being treated like the stepchild of the House -- has the potential leadership and organizing vision in place to be ready the next time the nation clamors for a step forward and, in the meantime, to finish what was started on March 21, 2010.

<snip>

Link (all as one page version): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/08/power-struggle-inside-the_n_530247.html?view=print

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flying rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick...
Edited on Thu Apr-08-10 07:48 PM by Mari333
'Progressives have received very little return on their investment when it comes to important votes. The 34 Democrats who voted against the health care reform bill in March have collectively received $2.1 million from progressive members. More than half of that sum came in the past five years.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Campaign finance reform
That's the only thing that will end this system of bribes and corruption. Everything else is useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. ...
re :puke: s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Grijalva rocks.
I sat with him and 3 others in a small motel airport bar in south Tucson a few years back. He was forthcoming and welcoming in his speech and his demeanor. He is also the antithesis to the blue dog Giffords down in So AZ. We need 200 more like him.

Thank you for sharing this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. A Couple Of My Faves...
On Harry Reid's support of the Public Option...

The White House didn't appreciate the new energy. A few hours after Reid's office put out a statement in support of the public option, Rahm Emanuel met senior Reid aide Jim Manley and a few reporters from the Washington Post and the New York Times for dinner and drinks at Lola's, a Capitol Hill bar and grill. Seeing Manley, Emanuel offered a response to Reid's gesture with one of his own: a double-bird, an eerie sight given his half-severed right finger.


And...

Both Clyburn and Hoyer say that they probably could have whipped enough votes to offset the loss of Stupak. "I think we could have," Clyburn says, who also adds they had the votes for the public option. "But I would much rather have 219 than try to eke out 216." 

Hoyer agrees. "I think we could've done it," he says, but getting that 216 would've forced more Blue Dogs to take a hard vote, something leadership would rather avoid. "We would've had to get more marginal members, the Blue Dog and other caucuses -- I guess the Blue Dogs primarily."

Stupak, as savvy a vote-counter as anybody in the House, saw it, too. "Speakers never bring a bill to the floor unless they have the votes. And they always have a few in reserve," Stupak explained to the Catholic News Agency in a post-vote interview. "I had a number of members who thanked us after, because they could vote no."



The public option died so that Rick Boucher could vote no. Progressives inside and outside of Congress have no intention of letting that happen again.


Ah... politics...

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirrera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kick !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
12. Morning Kick...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks for this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. You Are Quite Welcome !!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
14. Cowards, Corporations and Conservatives. They've already got a party.
Thank you, WillyT. MUST-READ is right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. Thank You, Octafish !!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. "I want my country back" still rings true, as it did in 2008.
And yet we hear at DU that we should primary the Democratic congressman who spoke those words at our last national convention.

Dark days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
16. btw, GREAT faux pulp cover! (click!) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. What's Funny Is It Came From DU Through Google... Here's A Larger Version:


Don't know who created it, but I definitely love it!

:shrug:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
17. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, WillyT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. You Are Quite Welcome !!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
19. K&R; everyone needs to be aware of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
20. Post this in the Presidential forum
Where most of the people in denial post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. That'll just lead to flames, trolling, and an eventual lock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
21. Someone needs to call the Democratic party on this immediatly
You're base is not made up of New Democrats and Blue Dogs!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. K&R, great read!
Progressives have received very little return on their investment when it comes to important votes. The 34 Democrats who voted against the health care reform bill in March have collectively received $2.1 million from progressive members. More than half of that sum came in the past five years.


"Thanks for the money, suckers! Be sure to show up to vote for us again in a few years--until then, STFU."

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
26. K&R.. thanks Willy
You have provided some great reading this week...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Thank You For Your Kind Words, walldude !!!
My pleasure.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
29. Last Kick From Me...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
30. What soul?
They shit on everyone in the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Touche' !!! - LOL !!!
Hey man, I've got some soul right here!

:evilgrin:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC