Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In honor of Justice Stevens

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 12:02 PM
Original message
In honor of Justice Stevens


"The fact that the nation’s attention will shift so quickly to speculation about his successor, rather than an appreciation of him, is unfortunate." -Tom Goldstein

This thread is not about who his replacement will be but about honoring the service and career of Justice Stevens. Please, limit your thoughts and comments to this.


Career Highlights
  • Fourth-longest-serving Justice in the history of the United States
  • Second oldest Justice ever
  • Served in the United States Navy from 1942–1945 as a commissioned intelligence officer
  • Awarded the Bronze Star

  • Personal Highlights
  • Watched Babe Ruth’s “called shot” during the game 3 of the 1932 World Series
  • Attend University of Chicago Laboratory Schools 71 years before Malia and Sasha Obama
  • Like President Obama was resident of Hyde Park in Chicago Illinois
  • Is known for his bow tie and for being a gentleman to advocates and peers


  • Famous Quotes

    On Bush v. Gore
    “Time will one day heal the wound to that confidence that will be inflicted by today’s decision. One thing, however, is certain. Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year’s Presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the Nation’s confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law.” ~Justice John Paul Stevens, Bush v. Gore.

    On the Freedom of Speech
    “The interest in encouraging freedom of expression in a democratic society outweighs any theoretical but unproven benefit of censorship.” Justice Stevens, Reno v. ACLU.

    On the Separation of Church and State
    "Whenever we remove a brick from the wall that was designed to separate religion and government, we increase the risk of religious strife and weaken the foundations of our democracy" ~Justice John Paul Stevens, Zelman v. Simmons-Harris.

    On the War Powers
    “For if this Nation is to remain true to the ideals symbolized by its flag, it must not wield the tools of tyrants even to resist an assault by the forces of tyranny.” ~Justice Stevens, Rumsfeld v. Padilla.

    On the Constitution as a Living Document
    “Perhaps even more important than our specific holding today is our reaffirmation of the basic principle that informs the Court’s interpretation of the Eighth Amendment. If the meaning of that Amendment had been frozen when it was originally drafted, it would impose no impediment to the execution of 7-year-old children today. The evolving standards of decency that have driven our construction of this critically important part of the Bill of Rights foreclose any such reading of the Amendment. In the best tradition of the common law, the pace of that evolution is a matter for continuing debate; but that our understanding of the Constitution does change from time to time has been settled since John Marshall breathed life into its text.” -Justice Stevens, ROPER V. SIMMONS


    Thank you for your service Justice Stevens...
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
    joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 12:04 PM
    Response to Original message
    1. If he had only done one thing in his career, and it was his scathing dissent of Bush v Gore...
    ...that would have been enough. Of course, he did more, but he called that steaming pile of s**t, written by 5 steaming piles of s**t what it was.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 05:35 PM
    Response to Reply #1
    6. And his ending comment will be remembered for a long time
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 09:02 PM
    Response to Reply #6
    13. I cut that comment out, made a sign of it alone and put it in a frame
    I posted it at work. It is the only comment of a political (or legal) nature I have ever put on my wall at work.

    I cannot tell you the state of mind I was in when I read that opinion. I thought I might be going crazy since I could not comprehend any of the rationale. The more I read the more upset I became. I was boiling ready to burst when I came to his dissent. Knowing he was appointed to the Court by Ford, as I read his words, my breathing started to return to normal. I knew then there was nothing wrong with me; it was those five justices who authorized the per curium (I hope I remembered and spelled that correctly) decision that was beyond belief. I could not understand how any of the five justices truly expected the majority of Americans to support that reasoning. Of course, I later understood they didn't care whether we did or not....

    I will never forget Justice Stevens for that dissent. He is, as they are saying tonight, an icon of intelligence and integrity. Someone else will take his chair, but he can never truly be replaced.

    Sam
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 09:31 PM
    Response to Reply #13
    14. Well said
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 12:07 PM
    Response to Original message
    2. Just turned on CNN and they are just talking about who will replace him verses him
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 12:07 PM
    Response to Original message
    3. Appointed by Republican President Gerald Ford. Back before the GOP lost its mind. nt
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 12:11 PM
    Response to Reply #3
    4. A fact that Stevens has noted many times
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 12:16 PM
    Response to Original message
    5. Obama to comment on his announcement shortly, MSNBC
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 05:46 PM
    Response to Original message
    7. Newsweek: John Paul Stevens's Legacy in Five Cases
    1. Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006)
    2. Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000)
    3. Massachusetts v. EPA (2006)
    4. Gonzalez v. Raich (2005)
    5. Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1984)

    http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thegaggle/archive/2010/04/09/john-paul-stevens-legacy-in-five-cases.aspx
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 05:53 PM
    Response to Original message
    8. "The End of an Era, for Court and Nation"
    "Justice John Paul Stevens, who announced his resignation from the Supreme Court on Friday after 34 years, may be the last justice from a time when ability and independence, rather than perceived ideology, were viewed as the crucial qualifications for a seat on the court."

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/10/us/politics/10judge.html?pagewanted=all
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 06:11 PM
    Response to Original message
    9. National Journal's "The Ninth Justice" is up again:
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 06:36 PM
    Response to Original message
    10. New National Law Journal blog: "Speaking of Stevens"
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 08:01 PM
    Response to Original message
    11. kick!
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 08:22 PM
    Response to Original message
    12. K&R
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 10:32 PM
    Response to Original message
    15. Stevens' Career In Pictures:
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 10:50 PM
    Response to Original message
    16. Americans United Praises Justice Stevens' Record On Church And State


    Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens has announced his intention to retire. Stevens, who has served on the high court since 1975, has been a stalwart defender of church-state separation.

    http://www.au.org/homepage/features/archive/2010/justice-john-paul-stevens.html?utm_source=au%2Bhomepage&utm_medium=homepage%2Bbanner&utm_campaign=Featured%2Bon%20homepage
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:01 AM
    Response to Original message
    Advertisements [?]
     Top

    Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

    Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
    Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


    Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

    Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

    About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

    Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

    © 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC