Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Instead of sitting by and watching while states abolish teacher tenure we need to demand it for all

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 12:14 PM
Original message
Instead of sitting by and watching while states abolish teacher tenure we need to demand it for all
Tenure doesn't grant any teacher a job for life. It guarantees due process if the school district decides to fire a teacher. The teacher is entitled to a written notification and an opportunity to appeal. That's it.

This is a right all workers should have. An employer should be required by law to have just cause to terminate any employee.

Instead of criticizing teachers for having tenure we should be working to guarantee it as a right for all workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Amen!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. ridiculous
this is a right ALL workers should have?

so,if you run a small business with two employees, your employees should have that right?

hell no

teachers otoh?

yes

but when it comes to small businesses, they need more flexibility and not ALL workers should have this right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yes all workers
I was fired from a part time retail job over the phone because a co-worker lied. Due process would have resulted in the co-worker's termination instead of mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. great but the current law does not require "just cause"
Edited on Fri Apr-09-10 04:25 PM by paulsby
or "any cause" at all for at will employees in many jurisdictions, and imo it is overburdening and injurious to small businesses to require just cause in many cases.

search for at will employees at wikipedia if you doubt my veracity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. And I am proposing that current law should call for just cause
I have a family member who was fired a few months ago from a job he had held for 10 years. He was the highest paid employee and they decided to make something up and fire him rather than lay him off. And his employer did this because they could.

The system should favor the worker rather than the employer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. how about a system that BALANCES the rights of the worker and the employer
Edited on Fri Apr-09-10 05:02 PM by paulsby
god forbid we should also protect the employer.

they are like all corporate'y and stuff.

ewwwww

like i said, some jobs (even in at will states) have special protections.

but why should the worker get MORE protection than the employer.

a worker has interests but so does an employer

an employer puts his capital at risk

he usually has to invest significant time/$$$ in training an employee and getting them up to speed

he risks theft/slippage etc. from dishonest employees

employers are an essential part of the engine of capitalism - that BUILDS wealth.

they deserve protection

and so do workers.

if you work at an at will job, then you know (or SHOULD) from the start, that this is your status


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Are you assuming workers have a choice?
Cause they don't. Most jobs are at will nowadays. That's an unfair advantage to the employer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. They must have just cause already.
"I am out of money and can't pay the person any more", is a valid reason.

"I don't like brunettes", is not a valid reason.

If they fire and the reason is pure BS then the employee is entitled to unemployment.

Hell even Steve Forbes when running for president said this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. not in many jurisdictions. you are wrong under the law
in many, they do NOT need just cause.

see: at will employees

hth

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/At-will_employment
"any hiring is presumed to be "at will"; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals "for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all," and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. And the unemployment can be denied
And is almost always denied when the worker is fired rather than laid off. Then the worker has to appeal and has no income while waiting for a ruling.

That's not a fair system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. I agree, system is a million miles from being just.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. EVERY Worker
Every single worker should have these rights.

NO worker should be fired without notification of the specific reason(s) for his or her removal.

And ALL workers should have the RIGHT to appeal an unjust or unwarrented removal before an impartial third party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. right on
I don't understand what it is about Americans that, when somebody has something we don't, we want to take it away from them instead of getting it for ourselves.

We should be trying to get better workplace protection for everyone, not taking it away from those who have organized and fought for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Glad you get it
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. del
Edited on Fri Apr-09-10 02:49 PM by harun
wrong spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. A teacher in New York told an eighth grader "you have a sexy body"
He cannot be fired because of tenure, but the schools chancellor will not allow him back into the classroom, so he is being paid over $100,000 per year by the NYC Department of Education to report each day to a "rubber room" where he spends the day overseeing his multi-million dollar real-estate portfolio. And there are many others like him.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/leazy_of_rubber_room_vJlavofm7uiZjmfrTAgTxM

I am not enthusiastic about extending the concept of tenure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Bullshit
They can fire him. This is administrative incompetence. Why should every good teacher be penalized because of this stupid one? Be angry at the admins who can't figure out how to fire a teacher rather than the teachers who don't tell their students they are sexy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Clearly you didn't read the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. NY Post - nuff said
I stand by my comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. There is a teacher in my wifes school
Who kicked a child she was reprimanded and went before some review board and was returned to the classroom. I am with you there needs to be more flexibility when it comes to teacher firings not less. There also needs to be a substantial increase in teacher pay to go along with that though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. False accusations are a dime a dozen
I had a kid accuse me of picking him up and body slamming him against the wall. It was investigated by the district and the mother was so angry when they said it was an unfounded accusation that she filed a police report. I was exonerated but I wouldn't be surprised if that mother is on the internet somewhere claiming a teacher body slammed her son and is still teaching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. This was witnessed by multiple students
And she has a track record already. You can hide your head in the sand all you want and pretend it isn't happening if you wish but I know for a fact that it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. The problem in public ed with "tenure" is the principal has ALL the power
Edited on Fri Apr-09-10 05:29 PM by tonysam
while the teacher has none. A principal can make up any bullshit excuse and call it "cause," knowing the administrative law system will support his or her wrongful actions. School districts merely rig the game in their favor. Teachers are typically too poor to hire a lawyer to appeal terminations, which are almost always upheld by hearing officers and others depending on the state, and they have limited options in the civil court system.

I've been through this bullshit called "due process," and I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. It works well where I teach
There are many years when no tenured teachers are fired. It's ALWAYS because the admins didn't follow directions. Too stupid to fill out the right paperwork and turn it in on time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. How do you know that? The hearings are usually secret.
Edited on Fri Apr-09-10 05:40 PM by tonysam
Outside of a handful of cases where the teachers commit criminal acts, these terminations are generally not known to the public. It's very, very, very secret. NOBODY on the staff at the school where I worked knew ANYTHING about what had happened to me. To this day--two years later--I doubt they know anything. Only the counselor knew and knows about it, but that was several months after this piece of crap fired me when I ran into him at the store. Nobody knew. The principal kept her mouth shut. I don't think even the two colleagues who lied for her knew. I don't think they ever knew what happened to me afterwards.

My shitbag principal violated EVERYTHING in the book--didn't even follow the Nevada Administrative Code--yet I was the one who was thrown out--not her. It was no big deal: the district falsified documents, committed perjury, suborned perjury, and bribed Washoe Education Association's executive director with a job working under the crook who spearheaded my firing and forced my principal to do it. The union's lawyer refused to allow me any witnesses. And then they picked the most biased arbitrator to hear the case. Some "due process."

She's still a principal, but she was moved. I am without a career because of this piece of human shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Because our board releases the data every year
I know exactly how many teachers are fired every year and whether or not they were tenured. I don't know their names but I know the number.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. They don't do it out here. The union must be stronger than this miserable excuse of one
Edited on Fri Apr-09-10 05:49 PM by tonysam
here.

I would also submit it is deceptive because many teachers are forced to resign in lieu of dismissal or they resign before the "hearing." Or they take a settlement. That won't count as being "fired."

WCSD tried that shit of starving me into a settlement--which would have been a piddling $10K after two years of abuse by them--by putting me on unpaid leave. Most teachers would take the settlement thus depriving themselves of unemployment compensation.

So whatever a board says doesn't mean squat. It doesn't mean teachers aren't being pushed out--they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. HIgh school teacher tenure is a misuse of the term
Probationary vs permanent, not unlike that used with Federal Civil Service would be much more appropriate. It would also end the confusion with college profs in the minds of many people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
27. I agree those of us in unions need to stand together because if we don't they screw us all
Every time a union job is lost everyones union become weaker. That is a fact.

I used to try and tell people that here but no one wanted to listen. They wanted to tell me all about their magic Toyotas and Hondas back then.

I will be proud to stand with my union brother and sisters in the teaching profession. You have my full support.

Just a piece of advice though. I belong to the UAW and would appreciate some reciprocal support when the time comes. Supporting workers in Japan or South Korea or some non-unionized auto plant here in the US only weakens your own union.

Might seem like a bright idea at the time but purchasing that imported car could eventually cost you your own job. I am someone who pays attention to what kind of cars are in employee parking lots. I know a lot of other auto workers who do the same thing.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC