Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On the breaking Pope revelation just now, this atheist has wise advice for all churches:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 02:59 PM
Original message
On the breaking Pope revelation just now, this atheist has wise advice for all churches:
Please put kind, compassionate, humble, imaginative, loving, moral men and women at the heads of your churches. Build your religions on those who are courageous enough to do the right but unpopular thing as opposed to those who fear rocking the boat to the point that they won't bother to pull drowning parishioners into it.

The point of any church's clergy is to set a good example.

'member?

Do not put install politicians there. Do not install "company men" there. Do not install the power-hungry, the prideful, the literalists, the incurious, or anything of the sort.

Your religious movement will be healthier for it. Those who do not follow your religion will breathe a little easier.

Pope Benedict hit by new Church child abuse allegation

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Women in charge would improve things greatly IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Men and women are equally capable of nonsense.
Does Sarah Palin ring a bell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I agree- sex is no guarantee of anything. n/t
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Or Phyllis Schlafly
or any of the other Gorgons of the far right.

While Rome should be repudiated and the priesthood opened to both sexes as it was likely intended to be in the earliest years, I don't think women as a whole are superior. We have too many present examples of monsters.

Opening the priesthood to married people of both sexes would have a liberalizing effect on the church's harshest teachings regarding women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Last time I checked, she was not an expert on bells either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. You think Catholic nuns didn't abuse those in their power, rampantly?
magdalene laundries

Google it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojeoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Sinead Oconnor got sent to one. Check out her recent letter.
Remember when she ripped up a photo of the last pope?

www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/.../AR2010032502363.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. You never hear it discussed that not only was there damage done to the actual victims
By the pedophile priests - but also that by having these people be the main person that anyone in the parish could approach for solace and/or counseling when experiencing difficulties - these priests often didn't care to spend time with you because they were too busy recruiting their victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. People who are "humble" will never rise to be a head of a church
If they appear humble, you can be sure that it is just a pose.

Church politics (or politics of any kind) does not reward humility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. DIng ding we have a winner
It's always politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I was thinking about that. There is at least one Catholic Saint canonized recently who...
Edited on Fri Apr-09-10 03:21 PM by Poll_Blind
...was extremely humble, selfless and among all criteria set forth by the Catholic Church was essentially a "shoe-in". Can't recall his name, I think he was canonized in 2002-ish. I think he was from South America.

But I doubt he would have risen far in the Church, itself.

Given the nature of their particular message, maybe it's time to rethink what makes the head of a church should be. What if it was an unshaven ascetic, prone to rocking the boat and calling a spade a spade, but who had absolutely no tolerance for corruption within it?

Like that Jesus guy, for example.

He'd be sweeping the floors. I have little doubt he'd punch a pedophile priest in the face and it'd take a couple of bishops to pull him off. If he went apeshit on the moneylenders I can only imagine how he'd react to child victimization.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Jesus was not actually that humble.
John 12:8 New International Version (©1984)
"You will always have the poor among you, but you will not always have me."

Matthew 26:11 New International Version (©1984)
"The poor you will always have with you, but you will not always have me."

An assumption of personal specialness, as opposed to the undifferentiated, undying, unimportant, unending poor. Immediately after that breathtaking arrogance, Judas sells him to the Romans for one-tenth the value of the expensive oil used to anoint him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. remember though
that our current bibles are a result of a purge of some of the more beatific versions of Christ. The orthodox church and the first convocations eradicated the Essenes and the Gnostics as well as other Christian sects that believed one didn't need A CHURCH to worship God. It wasn't until the "orthodox" Christians co-opted the Roman Empire (and made it "Holy") that the truly varied interpretations of Christ and his life were eradicated completely. We were lucky to have found the Dead Sea Scrolls...

Highly recommended reading, The Dark Side of Christian History by Helen Ellerbe.

As for your quote(s), well, that just seems honest. Not necessarily humble or prideful, just honest. Which is what i would expect to hear from Jesus.

:shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Honest?
To rate only his own individuality as meaningful? To treat the poor, not as suffering individuals, but as an amorphous, unfeeling lump who need not be considered when anyone more important is around?

What I remember is that Judas heard this and immediately went out and sold him for a tenth of the value of the oil wasted on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. what you quoted
doesn't say what you're implying here. Why shouldn't he rate his own individuality as meaningful? He claimed to be the SON OF GOD, fer chrissakes... what he doesn't say is ONLY his own meaning is important.

Your impression of Christs assessment of the poor is unfounded as well.

I'm a Druid, but i know enough of the bible to know that Jesus was a pretty cool dude. Even though it's not a historically accurate depiction, it captures the affect he had on the people of the time. He loved the poor and destitute more than anyone else...

So, what, you got a beef with Jesus? Or just feel like arguing with someone?


I :shrug: again...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Well then, that means that the lowliest priests may be more deserving of the papacy
And yet, it's those priests who do the buggering of children.

Hmmmmm.....

I guess the whole church is rotten to the core.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Here is some advise from another Atheist. Stop lying and shut your doors.
I'm sure that the heads of all of these religions know that they are pedaling a load of bunk to the faithful. Take pity on these poor sheep and tell them the truth and then go jump in the lake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. No large, powerful, and profitable organization goes out of business voluntarily
just because top management knows they are peddling a destructive product.

For example, the tobacco companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Cigarettes? Almost as repulsive and dangerous as religion.
Too bad there isn't a quit god worship patch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. An exorcism of the second kind, as it were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. Upon this rock.
Oops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindandSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
18. Great advice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
23. Permitting married and women priests would discourage "therapeutic" vocations.
Some see the priesthood as therapy for their own sexual confusion, like others see law enforcement as a means to express their anger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC