Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

States Move To Limit Role Of Credit Checks In Hiring

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 06:51 AM
Original message
States Move To Limit Role Of Credit Checks In Hiring
Edited on Sat Apr-10-10 06:55 AM by babylonsister
As a Hiring Filter, Credit Checks Draw Questions
By ANDREW MARTIN
Published: April 9, 2010


Lauryn Beer of Washington says she believes she has missed out on several potential employment opportunities because of her credit history.

Retailers lose more than $30 billion a year because of employee theft, he says. Workplace violence costs employers $55 million a year in lost wages. A third of employees provide bogus information on their résumés.

Screening the backgrounds of employees “is critical to protect the safety of Connecticut residents in their homes and offices, in their cars and in all other places they travel,” Mr. Rosenberg testified to Connecticut legislators in February 2009, explaining why TransUnion markets its credit reports to employers.

Trouble is, researchers say there is no evidence showing that people with weak credit are more likely to be bad employees or to steal from their bosses, a fact that Mr. Rosenberg himself later admitted.

“At this point we don’t have any research to show any statistical correlation between what’s in somebody’s credit report and their job performance or their likelihood to commit fraud,” he said in separate testimony to Oregon legislators in January.

With millions of Americans nursing damaged credit reports after a bruising recession, some lawmakers are seeking to limit the use of credit reports as a factor in hiring.

Legislators in more than a dozen states have introduced bills to curb the use of credit checks during the hiring process, and three states have passed such laws.

At the federal level, Representative Steve Cohen, Democrat of Tennessee, is pursuing his own legislation that would prohibit employers nationwide from using credit checks to discriminate in hiring.


more...

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/10/business/10credit.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent news!
This is a terrible, terrible practice intended to do nothing more than discriminate against the financially troubled.


I'm confident that most of the assholes on Wall Street who swindled the US out of trillions had squeaky-clean credit reports, but some poor schlub applying to be a night-shift minimum wage security guard won't get hired because he missed two credit card payments six years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. They have no more to do with employment than with your driving.
and they are used for that too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. If they require bonding, it may be necessary, but for the run-of-the-mill job
it should not be a factor.

The problem is that it's so cheap and easy to do, bosses may do it anyway, without your knowledge, because when someone hires you, you have to sign all kinds of paperwork, and refusing to sign something could send up a red flag that could disqualify you without you ever being told that was why..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. You could argue that debt might make for a better employee.
Someone with a lot of debt may be more motivated to work hard, show up on time, etc. in order to keep the job and earn increases. Obviously that wouldn't be true for everyone, but it's just as valid an argument as saying that they'd be a bad employee. It all depends on how they accumulated the debt.

Someone with bad debt could be a deadbeat or they could be someone who is desperate to pay it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. People's personal finances should not be part of any hiring
process imo. Some folks are in pickles because they're unemployed; I don't think focusing on their credit history should trump their work qualifications.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Absolutely.
I agree completely. It doesn't make any sense to use it as a criteria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dear Rep. Cohen: Your own TN University system does this ...
By signing below, I hereby authorize all entities having information about me, including present and former
employers, personal references, criminal justice agencies, departments of motor vehicles, schools, licensing
agencies, and credit reporting agencies, to release such information to the company or any of its affiliates or
carriers. I acknowledge and agree that this Release and Authorization shall remain valid and in effect during
the term of my contract.

http://www.tntech.edu/images/stories/hr/forms/facultyapp.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC