Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

National Enquirer nominated for Pulitzer prize for

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 10:42 AM
Original message
National Enquirer nominated for Pulitzer prize for
the John Edwards story. THis should shame the so called M$Greedia posse.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. I. Love. It. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. At least they check their facts so I have been told!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. I've posted this at DU multiple times before
The Enquirer breaks these stories because they hired up the investigative journalists being fired from papers around the country prior to the OJ Simpson trial.

Obviously, nobody here admits to reading them, but they are at the forefront of this type of journalism. Also, they've been sued before, but IIRC, they have not been sued successfully since Carol Burnett's suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No DUplicitous DUpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I remember that they came up with the most damning evidence against OJ..
..when they published him wearing the shoes at a Monday Night Football game that made the footprints at the murder scene.

OJ had said "I don't own those ugly ass shoes"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. The New York Times called them the "paper of record"
at that time.

I don't buy the Enquirer, but I'm not stupid enough to think that they haven't broken some of the more important stories over the last couple of years. If they win the Pulitzer for the Edwards story, heads will explode in the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Cool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. They also broke the story about Palin having an affair with the Toddler's business partner.
THAT story needs a follow up. And if they get a Pulitzer, then it will lend even more weight to that story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm with you on this one
Love it. :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good for them.
Certain journalists tell the truth, double check their facts, hire excellent lawyers, and are lawsuit proof because they do their homework, but most people refuse to believe them.

Two examples: Michael Moore and Kitty Kelley.

Truth is a defense to slander. Some people don't like to see their media idols taken down as human beings, and sometimes not very nice ones at that.


Kitty Kelley has a book on OPRAH coming out tomorrow. Should be good for an uproar, as her books always are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC