Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Amnesty International's women's officer resigns due to Amnesty's promotion of theocracy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:43 AM
Original message
Amnesty International's women's officer resigns due to Amnesty's promotion of theocracy
Amnesty Prefers Jihadists to Feminists

Gita Sahgal, its women's officer, has finally decided to resign. In her resignation statement she says that Amnesty remains unconcerned that its poster boy Moazzam Begg, a former Guantanamo detainee, is now involved with an organisation called Cageprisoners which has championed the views of jihadists. Amnesty has persuaded itself that Islamism is not objectionable as long as it does not threaten civilians. As theocracy can be nothing other than the suppression of civilians, their self-persuasion took some doing. Neverthless as Gita says, "They have stated that the idea of jihad in self defence is not antithetical to human rights; and have explained that they meant only the specific form of violent jihad that Moazzam Begg and others in Cageprisoners assert is the individual obligation of every Muslim." Amnesty is playing the sly liberal's get-out-of-jail card: a one-sided cultural determinism. Jihadism is a part of "Muslim" culture, says Amnesty, so we cannot criticise it, indeed we must promote it. Yet if the head of a pro western intelligence agency were to say that colonialism was part of his cultural inheritance, Amnesty would condemn him as a racist.
Full article: http://standpointmag.co.uk/node/2917
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. There's another agenda to this story as I agree with Amnesty with regard to the following tenet:
Edited on Mon Apr-12-10 09:49 AM by ShortnFiery
"Amnesty has persuaded itself that Islamism is not objectionable as long as it does not threaten civilians."

The Jesuits of my faith (Catholicism) have what might be considered Jihad too. Well, they're the sub-group who are the most practical and often times most active with regard to social justice issues. :shrug:

They are, IMO, beautiful souls. I would never pass muster to be a good Jesuit.

http://www.jesuit.org/old/SocialJustice/default.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, since you're a woman...
... your comment about never "passing muster to be a good Jesuit" is a moot point, isn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC