Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Coal Company Had Twice Settled Court Cases By Promising Safety Upgrades

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 02:32 PM
Original message
Coal Company Had Twice Settled Court Cases By Promising Safety Upgrades

Coal Company Had Twice Settled Court Cases By Promising Safety Upgrades
Feds and Investors Thought Legal Action Would Give Massey Energy Incentive to Improve Conditions

Over the past two years, controversial coal boss Don Blankenship has twice agreed to courtroom settlements requiring his company to clean up a checkered safety record, yet federal documents show Massey Energy mines continued to rack up serious violations in advance of the explosion that killed 29 miners this week.

The first legal agreement came when Massey Energy executives settled a lawsuit filed by corporate shareholders in May 2008, after the investors alleged that safety and environmental shortcuts at the mines were proving too costly in legal fees and fines. To settle the case, Massey agreed to form an independent safety committee, hire outside safety consultants, and enhance the safety procedures at its underground mines.

Joseph F. Rice, who represented the investors in the case, said he now wonders whether Massey complied with the court's order enforcing that agreement.

"We are in the process of determining whether they ignored that court order," Rice told ABC News on Friday. "We intend to find out what they've done. Our shareholders are concerned about what the company has or has not done after they made this agreement."

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/west-virginia-mine-disaster-coal-company-settled-court/story?id=10338909
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. THEIR OWN SHAREHOLDERS SUED THEM OVER THIS?
wth? If that doesn't make old Don look guilty of manslaughter, what does? Talk about an open secret safety problem!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. The evidence suggests noncompliance.
On the other hand, if there was compliance, think of how horridly unsafe the mine must have been before "safety was improved." In any case, anything they did didn't work. And now the shareholders can face the prospect of a bunch of suits on the basis of criminal negligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC