Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Green Zone Under Fire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 06:07 PM
Original message
Green Zone Under Fire
Will mercs now take matters into their own hands if the military doesn't react the way they want it to?


http://www.iraqslogger.com/index.php/post/2624/Green_Zone_Under_Fire

Green Zone Under Fire
Rocket Attacks Taking Toll on Sitting Duck Contractors
By ROBERT Y. PELTON Posted 1 hr. 19 min. ago


The remains of a rocket in the Karada District
ALI AL-SAADI/AFP/Getty Images


After enduring three days of rocket attacks on the Green Zone, Slogger sources report that contractors billeted inside the Zone may take matters into their own hands if the U.S. Army does not do something to better secure the area.

A source with a security company based inside the Green Zone reports that one of his fellow American contractors was killed Monday while lying on his bed talking on the phone to his wife. On Tuesday, shrapnel reportedly injured more Americans. On Wednesday a rocket killed a group of TCNs or Third country nationals.

The Wednesday attack appears to be the only one to have made the news, as AP reported the US embassy acknowledged the death of four contractors from the Philippines, Nepal and India.

A security company approached the US military on Thursday to discuss the matter, and was told that the resources are not available to prevent the attacks. The contractor reportedly offered to use his men to begin undertaking countermeasures if the military was unable to provide security, but the idea was not an item of serious discussion.

One source tells me there is a simple solution, but the US military is failing to pursue it. "It doesn't take much to solve this problem. Snipers in overwatch positions. We are ready to do it--just waiting for approval."

Contractors are both trained, equipped and ready to provide overwatch to take out the hit and run rocket brigades as a self-defense measure, but indications are that they may just have to hunker down and endure for the moment.

"We are getting tired of it and feel that we can stop it within 24 to 48 hours," says one contractor not looking forward to another sleepless night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. I could care less what happens to mercs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I care if they use their guns instead of their heads and put lots of
people in further jeopardy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I didn't say that I do not care about their victims.
;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Mercs were hurt and killed
oh well

Sorry if I sound cruel and like I don't care, but they CHOSE to be there for money, not principle or love of country'

And if the enemy paid high enough, they would be the ones firing at our troops... yep the nature of mercenary armies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. They're not contactors. They're MERCs: hired guns.

We shouldn't be funding any of them at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. They'll only succeed in escalating things
The Green Zone is a high profile target and that won't stop being the case just because some mercs decide to take matters into their own hands. It's that kind of reckless, wanton violence that has made the US presence such a popular target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Everyone else read 'mercenaries'...
Edited on Thu May-03-07 06:46 PM by stillcool47
while I read 'contractors'. Why is that? And why...if they are mercs, can they not provide security...isn't that what they are hired to do? It's not like there's a law or something...strange

British Companies Making a Fortune
out of Iraq Conflict
By Robert Verkaik
Independent
March 13, 2006

A total of 61 British companies are identified as benefiting from at least £1.1bn of
contracts and investment in the new Iraq. But that figure is just the tip of the iceberg.

British businesses have profited by at least £1.1bn since coalition forces toppled Saddam
Hussein three years ago, the first comprehensive investigation into UK corporate investment
in Iraq has found. The company roll-call of post-war profiteers includes some of the best
known names in Britain's boardrooms as well many who would prefer to remain anonymous. They
come from private security services, banks, PR consultancies, urban planning consortiums,
oil companies, architects offices and energy advisory bodies.
---------------------------------
Corporate Watch believes it could be as much as five times higher, because many companies
prefer to keep their relationship secret. The waters are further muddied by the Government's
refusal to release the names of companies it has helped to win contracts in Iraq
...<read more>
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=13...


Blood, Sweat & Tears:
Asia’s Poor Build US Bases in Iraq
By David Phinney
CorpWatch
October 3, 2005

Called “third country nationals” (TCN) in contractor’s parlance, they hail largely from impoverished Asian countries such as the Philippines, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, and Pakistan, as well as from Turkey and countries in the Middle East. Once in Iraq, TCNs earn monthly salaries between $200 to $1,000 as truck drivers, construction workers, carpenters, warehousemen, laundry workers, cooks, accountants, beauticians, and similar blue-collar jobs.

Invisible Army of Cheap Labor

Tens of thousands of such TNC laborers have helped set new records for the largest civilian workforce ever hired in support of a U.S. war. They are employed through complex layers of companies working in Iraq. At the top of the pyramid-shaped system is the U.S. government which assigned over $24 billion in contracts over the last two years.
Just below that layer are the prime contractors like Halliburton and Bechtel. Below them are dozens of smaller subcontracting companies-- largely based in the Middle East --including PPI, First Kuwaiti Trading & Contracting and Alargan Trading of Kuwait, Gulf Catering, Saudi Trading & Construction Company of Saudi Arabia. Such companies, which recruit and employ the bulk of the foreign workers in Iraq, have experienced explosive growth since the invasion of Iraq by providing labor and services to the more high-profile prime contractors.
<read more>http://corpwatch.org/article.php?id=12675



Worry Grows as Foreigners Flock
to Iraq's Risky Jobs
By Sonni Efron
Los Angeles Times
July 30, 2005

For hire: more than 1,000 U.S.-trained former soldiers and police officers from Colombia. Combat-hardened, experienced in fighting insurgents and ready for duty in Iraq.

This eye-popping advertisement recently appeared on an Iraq jobs website, posted by an American entrepreneur who hopes to supply security forces for U.S. contractors in Iraq and elsewhere. If hired, the Colombians would join a swelling population of heavily armed private military forces working in Iraq and other global hot spots. They also would join a growing corps of workers from the developing world who are seeking higher wages in dangerous jobs, in what some critics say is a troubling result of efforts by the U.S. to "outsource" its operations in Iraq and other countries.

In a telephone interview from Colombia, the entrepreneur, Jeffrey Shippy, said he saw a booming global demand for his "private army," and a lucrative business opportunity in recruiting Colombians. Shippy, who formerly worked for DynCorp International, a major U.S. security contractor, said the Colombians were willing to work for $2,500 to $5,000 a month, compared with perhaps $10,000 or more for Americans. But where Shippy sees opportunity, others see trouble. Rep. Jan Schakowsky, an Illinois Democrat, worries that U.S. government contractors are hiring thousands of impoverished former military personnel, with no public scrutiny, little accountability and large hidden costs to taxpayers. ----------------------------------------------------------------
Fijians, Ukrainians, South Africans, Nepalese and Serbs reportedly are on the job in Iraq. Peter W. Singer of the Brookings Institution, author of a book on the private military industry, said veterans of Latin American conflicts, including Guatemalans, Salvadorans and Nicaraguans, also had turned up. "What we've done in Iraq is assemble a true 'coalition of the billing,' " Singer said, playing off President Bush's description of the U.S.-led alliance of nations with a troop presence in Iraq as a "coalition of the willing."

There are no reliable figures on the number of guards from Colombia or other countries. According to Shippy, private military experts and news reports, North Carolina-based Blackwater USA has sent 120 Colombians to Iraq. In addition, the firm reportedly has hired 122 Chileans. The reports are difficult to verify because many large companies, including DynCorp, which is based in Texas and operates in 40 countries, have policies against speaking to the media. Gary Jackson, president of Blackwater USA, said he had no comment. <<read more>>
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issue...


Colombia & Iraq: Halliburton Makes the Connection
By Daniel Leal Diaz
World War 4 Report
January 17, 2005

The Bogota daily El Tiempo recently reported that the US military contractor Halliburton has recruited 25 retired Colombian police and army officers to provide security for oil infrastructure in Iraq. One of the men, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the officers met in Bogota on Dec. 2 with a Colombian colonel working on behalf of Halliburton Latin America, who offered them monthly salaries of $7,000 to provide security for oil workers and facilities in several Iraqi cities. The claim was confirmed by a Colombian government source, said El Tiempo, but denied by a Halliburton representative in Bogota. US media have reported that former soldiers from Chile, South Africa and Spain are being recruited to beef up Iraqi security forces.Halliburton, the oil services giant once run by US Vice President Dick Cheney, has won billions of dollars in Iraq contracts, but has been accused of overcharging and accounting irregularities. (Al-Jazeera, Dec. 13; AP, Dec. 17)-------------------------------------
The US has transformed Colombia's soldiers into some of the best mercenaries in the world through decades of a mutating war that never seems to end: communism, drugs and--the latest version--terrorism. As Halliburton exploits this expertise for the Iraq campaign, Colombia becomes poorer in every dimension: violation of human rights, indiscriminate violence, loss of sovereignty and a crumbling democracy.<<read more>>http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/interve...



'Mercenaries' to Fill Iraq Troop Gap
By Brian Brady
Scotsman
February 25, 2007

The size of the private-security companies market is difficult to determine, but an estimated 10,000 to 30,000 private security contractors are thought to be working in Iraq. At a conference of British private-security companies last month, delegates said that the industry had increased about tenfold over the past decade and was worth the equivalent of about $4bn (£2.04bn) a year.

Almost 40 international PSCs are licensed to operate in Iraq, and the Foreign Office has paid out tens of millions of pounds to a handful of the largest British firms over the past four years. The department's bill for bodyguard protection alone rose from £19m in 2003-04 to £48m the following year. Most of the firms employ veterans from the forces, including former members of the SAS and SBS, who can command wages of up to £600 a day. One company has taken £112m in just three years. Another has been paid £42m for work in Afghanistan and Iraq.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Both the Foreign Office and the MoD are believed to have supported an expanded role since early in the Iraq operation and Downing Street is now rumoured to favour the move as part of the accelerated withdrawal announced by Blair last week. "There are genuine worries that the government is trying to privatise the Iraq conflict," said War on Want's campaigns director, John Hilary. "The occupation of Iraq has allowed British mercenaries to reap huge profits. How can Tony Blair hope to restore peace and security in Iraq while allowing mercenary armies to operate completely outside the law?"<<read more>>..
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issue...


Census Counts 100,000 Contractors In Iraq
Civilian Number, Duties Are Issues
By Renae Merle
Washington Post
December 5, 2006
There are about 100,000 government contractors operating in Iraq, not counting subcontractors, a total that is approaching the size of the U.S. military force there, according to the military's first census of the growing population of civilians operating in the battlefield.

The survey finding, which includes Americans, Iraqis and third-party nationals hired by companies operating under U.S. government contracts, is significantly higher and wider in scope than the Pentagon's only previous estimate, which said there were 25,000 security contractors in the country.

........................................................
Kellogg, Brown and Root, one of the largest contractors in Iraq, said it does not delineate its workforce by country but that it has more than 50,000 employees and subcontractors working in Iraq, Afghanistan and Kuwait. MPRI, a unit of L-3 Communications, has about 500 employees working on 12 contracts, including providing mentors to the Iraqi Defense Ministry for strategic planning, budgeting and establishing its public affairs office. Titan, another L-3 division, has 6,500 linguists in the country.
........................................................
The census gives military commanders insight into the contractors operating in their region and the type of work they are doing, Wittkoff said. "It helps the combatant commanders have a better idea of food and medical requirements they may need to provide to support the contractors," she said.
<<read more>>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Aren't contractors with weapons who want to do bodily damage considered
mercs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Why assume these dead contractors had weapons?
If the low-ball number of contractors, equals or exceeds the number of U.S. troops...how does anyone know who's doing what to who, and for who? And, why look at it with such a narrow view? I think the perception that the great number of foreign workers are mercenaries is incorrect. And yet even those that are mercs...I don't understand the differentiation between a U.S. soldier and a hired-soldier in an occupied country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I'm not talking about the dead ones, but the live ones who want to
defend the green zone because they don't think the military are. From the article:

A security company approached the US military on Thursday to discuss the matter, and was told that the resources are not available to prevent the attacks. The contractor reportedly offered to use his men to begin undertaking countermeasures if the military was unable to provide security, but the idea was not an item of serious discussion.

snip//

"We are getting tired of it and feel that we can stop it within 24 to 48 hours," says one contractor not looking forward to another sleepless night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I don't understand ...
There's something here I'm not getting...the U.S. government employs "Security" Contractors to provide security...and yet they can't provide the security necessary for their own safety?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. IMO not if they're going to usurp the opinions and decisions of the military.
I'm very leery of the Blackwater types out there anyway; per Jeremy Scahill, they've in the past been known to try to give orders to the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC