Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did I hear Tancredo say a threat to Israel is a threat to America?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Robson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:01 PM
Original message
Did I hear Tancredo say a threat to Israel is a threat to America?
Edited on Thu May-03-07 08:03 PM by Robson
Bull shit.

That's the kind of philosophy that has got this country into its current predicament. A threat to Israel is a threat to Israel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Our current predicament has nothing to do with Israel. We did this all to ourselves.
Nice attempt to scapegoat the Jews and avoid taking responsibility for ourselves.

Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Who elected the USA as policeman of the world?
I must have missed the vote where the USA was elected as enforcer of world order and defender of countries such as Israel and others that have their own aggressive policies. I thought that the purpose of the UN was to identify and define aggressor nations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Your reply had nothing to do with Ian's post
I'll restate his point: the US is in this Iraq thing because of decisions made supposedly in the US' best interest. Israel wasn't involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. In fact, Israel was AGAINST the Iraq war. And Jews are more opposed to the war than any demographic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. AIPAC and Israel pretty closely parallel our political predicament here--the war-mongers call shots
even though majority don't agree with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. And your reply had nothing to do with the OP. Same with Ian's.
The question remains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Exactly. We got ourselves into this. Nice try blaming the Jews, though. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. there is a legitimate debate about how much sensitivity to Israel affected our decision to go to war
I lean toward thinking it was a secondary factor at best, but it is not anti-semitic or anything of the sort to examine the question, anymore than it would be to ask if Britain pressured us into World War I or II.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. who said anything about 'Jews'?
I thought he was talking about the policies of the state of Israel, controlled now by the right wing, as we are controlled by the neocons.

And are we to believe that 'they hate us for our freedoms' and not 'they are pissed about the Palestinians?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. The second shift. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. All prez candidates say that or they're doomed
Not that there's anything right with that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's too bad there aint much daylight between the parties on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. From an IMPERIAL POLICY he is right
look at a map.

That piece of land is STRATEGICALLY IMPORTANT and this has been known oh since Ramses II

Now that does not mean Isarel, any client state in that piece of land, and its failure poses a threat to the Empire in charge

Does not matter if this is the Egyptians, the Assirians, Rome, the Otoman Empire, England or the US.

But we are in this predicament becasue we are a DECLINING EMPIRE.

Now I am sure you didn't expect me to agree with the asshole, but stopped clocks are right twice a day and he was talking from the POV of an Empire... and an Empire we are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC