Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oklahoma Outrageous: This Is Simple LUNACY!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 06:46 AM
Original message
Oklahoma Outrageous: This Is Simple LUNACY!
CHICAGO: The governor of Oklahoma is considering tough new abortion bills that would allow doctors to withhold test results showing foetal defects and require women to answer intrusive questions.



The results of the questionnaires would be POSTED ONLINE.




Women would also be required to have a vaginal ultrasound and listen to a detailed description of the embryo or foetus in a third bill passed by the legislature on Monday.


The requirements would be among the most ''extreme'' in the US and were similar to those struck down by a state court as unconstitutional earlier this year, the Centre for Reproductive Rights said on Tuesday.


''Despite the prospect and cost of additional legal challenges, the legislature is determined to severely limit women's ability to get an abortion in the state, approving laws with clear constitutional flaws and with absolute disregard for women's rights and health,'' the centre said in a statement urging a veto of the bills.

A spokesman for the Governor, Brad Henry, declined to comment on his intention for the bills.


Neighbouring Nebraska passed a law last week prohibiting abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, a measure intended to target the few remaining providers of late-term abortions in the US.


more


<http://www.smh.com.au/world/antiabortion-bill-to-block-foetal-test-results-20100421-szqu.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
secondwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. ahem.....where do women's RIGHTS fit into all of this??????? This definitely has GOT


to be unconstitutional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. women's rights. what a joke. don't you know women don't HAVE rights.
we are just incubators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. not in oklahoma they don't, and a lot of them are a-ok with this.
we have a republican majority house and senate, so they are pushing all of the great republican social issues. including a law that requires the local police to NOT co-operate with the federal authorities in hate crime cases. poor gov is doing the best he can with trying to keep them in check. don't forget we're the home for tom coburn and mary fallin, who the latter is running to replace gov. henry. if she wins god only knows what stupid shit will come from the state of Oklahoma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Women in Oklahoma don't have rights. They all graciously submit to their husbands' authority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's beyond ugly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. What ever happened to not letting bureaucrats get between you and your doctor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The majority of those flathead bureaucrats are clueless men
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. I fear I am losing my capacity for surprise at this kind of thing,
but not my capacity for disgust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why would any woman consent to tests ...
Edited on Thu Apr-22-10 02:05 PM by surrealAmerican
... knowing that the results could be withheld? And if the results are only withheld in case of defects, wouldn't you just assume being denied the results would mean there was a defect?


It makes no sense at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC