Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin's Speaking Demands...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 07:42 AM
Original message
Palin's Speaking Demands...
Sarah Palin's Speaking Demands

A draft contract containing details about Sarah Palin's speaking fee and requirements was obtained by California State University, Stanislaus, students who claim they found the document in a Dumpster. Here are some of her demands:

* Hotel room must have a "moose couture" styling to it
* Most recent copy of all newspapers
* Children's caretaker must be of Korean ethnicity or higher
* 50-gallon aquarium containing a minimum of eight piranhas that haven't been fed in a week and a bucket of ducks
* If the name of the speaking venue exceeds four syllables, then it must be temporarily changed to "Thompson Hall"
* Book of word searches and package of string cheese for Todd
* Extra red clothing just in case something happens to her other red clothing
* Audio engineer must ensure speakers are capturing full cuntiness of voice
* Dressing-room lighting fixtures must be equipped with non-efficient bulbs
* Palin must have "five (5) black pillar candles of 13" in length and 3" in circumference, one (1) stone altar of Baphomet, one (1) obsidian dagger, and one (1) baby delivered to her dressing area no less than two hours prior to her speech"




I can't take credit for this...:(

http://www.theonion.com/articles/sarah-palins-speaking-demands,17287/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. For a while I knew a lot of administrators.
We could talk freely, since we had to cooperate on things for a couple of years. Since I was a high-level person in student government, the administrators were high-level in a university. (Not so much the chancellor, that stayed fairly formal, but vice-chancellors were both people I could drop in on uninvited, people I had to listen to, and people who tended realize they made a mistake if they didn't listen to me--because the chancellor would.)

I got an earful about invited speakers. Not just in my own department; most invited faculty speakers were forced to be humble. It was the ones invited by the university that had administrators irate. Special food, special cars ("nothing by Toyota"), special foods. Dinner had to be at one of several restaurants, at precisely the right time. They had to have extra rooms for meeting with other people, they had to have special clothing, they had to have special lighting. One specified the make and model of microphone that he'd use--that or no lecture. They stipulated the lighting--not too much blue, not too much red. One liked a specific brand of "sparkling water," but insisted on a specific temperature--and since it was a bit *too* sparkling he insisted that he be opened X minutes before consumption (but not more than a certain amount, because then it wasn't sparkling enough, and it had to be replaced after the lecture but before the questions). You get stipulations as to aides--sex, age, clothing style, hair color, quantities and right to object and have an instant replacement if the first one isn't a good "fit."

Seriously. It's hard to imagine how you can satirize something like this. The Onion doesn't succeed at this bit of satire, it just insults (which is fine for some, but I've never found base insult to be humorous).

It's like satirizing Stalin's accent--if you exceed his accent, in some ways, it's unintelligible; if you exceed it in others, you're merely stereotyping and insulting all Georgians--which people who stereotype Georgians found and find funny, in any event; if you mirror his accent well, it's merely an impersonation, albeit one that can land you in a prison; if you don't make it extreme enough, you're a Party member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eissa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. As am employee at this university
I cannot put into words our utter shame and anger at this ridiculous selection. The administration has completely ruined our 50th anniversary celebration. Most of us will be spending what should have been a festive, all-inclusive event protesting this idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC