Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hey, they held a party at taxpayer's expense- Tarp Banks Cut Lending, Raised Salaries

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 10:30 AM
Original message
Hey, they held a party at taxpayer's expense- Tarp Banks Cut Lending, Raised Salaries
Tarp Banks Cut Lending, Raised Salaries

by Steven D
Thu Apr 22nd, 2010 at 10:49:31 AM EST
I'm shocked*, shocked I tell you that the banks who received the most TARP money actually cut lending while raising executive salaries and bonuses! Who could have predicted that?

Banks that received federal assistance during the financial crisis reduced lending more aggressively and gave bigger pay raises to employees than institutions that didn't get aid, a USA TODAY/American University review found. <...>

USA TODAY and the American University Investigative Reporting Project used federal bank data to conduct the first comprehensive analysis comparing the behavior of 940 banks in the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and 7,400 banks outside it. Key findings about TARP's first year:

• Lending fell. The amount of loans outstanding to businesses and individuals fell 9.1% for the 12 months ending Sept. 30, 2009, at banks that participated in TARP compared with a 6.2% drop at banks that didn't.

• Employee pay rose. Average pay at banks getting aid rose 9.4% in the program's first year. By contrast, non-TARP banks increased salaries 1.8%.

• Cost-cutting limited. Banks in TARP cut costs less than those outside the program. Government-aided banks increased branches by 2.7% while non-TARP banks cut branches by 1.2%.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2010-04-21-tarp-banks_N.htm


more:
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2010/4/22/104931/631
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. As always, thank GAWD it passed.
The same folks who lost all that money assured us that there would be Armageddon if they didn't get trillions in taxpayer money. Well, they got the money, and no armageddon. QED, uh, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep. It works as well as my Bengal Tiger repellent
Since I've been using it, I haven't had any Bengal Tiger attacks. Just like that door to door salesman said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. References. Brilliant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC