Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you think President Obama was tough enough on Wall Street?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 01:05 PM
Original message
Do you think President Obama was tough enough on Wall Street?
As a couple of commentators have said, if one of these trillion-dollar banks got into trouble, our government would bail them out, no matter the price.

If that is true, then a $50 billion dollar fund would only be a drop in the bucket. Who would pick up the rest of it? The taxpayers? Again?

Should the Congress break up these largest banks? Ten or twelve years ago, the top six banks' holdings equalled 17% of the GNP. Today, the top six equal 63% of the GNP. What does that tell you?

Should the President have been tougher or did he play it just about right? What is your opinion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, he's not tough at all
To me tough would be to break up the TBTF banks into more manageable sizes instead of digging his heels in and keeping them alive.

One small point though, that $50 billion fund is supposedly only there to pay for banks to go into bankruptcy, not to bail them out (at least thats been the WH's message, dont know for sure).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But those that say he should be tougher..
...say that none of these biggest banks would be permitted to go under. We would pay whatever it cost to protect them. The $50 billion would not start to save one of these banks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. agree; not tough at all
and until naked shorting is banned from banks, not merely "regulated" ( a sham), the fraud and bubbles will continue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. I would like added to the bill
that no public company (that sells stock) can give a raise or a bonus if that company is losing money. And even have the salaries cut in half for the top executives until they start making money again. Stock buyers are really being ripped off when the price of their stock plummets and then bonuses are handed out in the millions. It's going to get to the point where no one will want to invest their money in the stock market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Tough enough?
Don't you have to be tough, before we can decide whether it was "enough"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Do theatrics really matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Nope, still begging them to "join us". They don't have to join anything
They need just comply.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC