PJPhreak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-22-10 04:08 PM
Original message |
What do ya'll think of this idea, |
|
does anybody know if there is any regulation regarding the mailing of a raw chicken thru the Mail?
I think Sue Lowden needs about 10,000 campaign Contributions.
|
azmouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-22-10 04:09 PM
Response to Original message |
1. A rubber chicken would make the same point. |
Ian David
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-22-10 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. What's the carbon footprint on a rubber chicken vs an actual chicken? n/t |
JuniperLea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-22-10 04:12 PM
Response to Original message |
virgogal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-22-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I don't know the rules but why on earth would you bother? Ridiculous IMHO. |
Demoiselle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-22-10 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Mail and then let the "Media" know that you've mailed them. |
|
With any luck, and with a massive number of rubber chickens going to this brilliant candidate...Everybody can be reminded, for a few more newscycles, of how mindboggling stupid she is.
|
thecrow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-22-10 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |
5. There are regulations for mailing birds |
|
I know when I mailed some doves I had to have a special box with filters to keep the dander in the box. I suppose one of those would hold a chicken. It probably costs more than the chicken, though.
Maybe you could barter for it. ;)
|
PJPhreak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-22-10 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. I was thinking a whole fryer from the local grocrey store, |
|
Edited on Thu Apr-22-10 05:52 PM by PJPhreak
Properly sealed so as not to inconvenience the Post office or any Carriers or Handlers...no one wants chicken drippins on their mail.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:15 AM
Response to Original message |