The Rise of the Corporate Court: How the Supreme Court is Putting Business First

[marmar]

from People for the American Way:



The Rise of the Corporate Court: How the Supreme Court is Putting Business First
From Bush v. Gore to Citizens United: The Making of a Corporate Democracy


People For the American Way Foundation today released "The Rise of the Corporate Court: How the Supreme Court is Putting Business First." The report exposes the undue deference the Supreme Court has paid to corporations at the expense of the legal rights of individuals.

More and more, the Supreme Court has become a political ally of big business," said Michael B. Keegan, President of People For the American Way Foundation. "Constitutional principles and laws enacted by Congress that protect ordinary Americans are being torn asunder. Under our laws and our Constitution everyone, including big business, should be held accountable for their actions. This Court seems all too willing to let the privileged and the powerful prevail over the rights of individual Americans."

Some of the cases highlighted in the report include:

* Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007), in which the Court protected corporations from lawsuits brought by victims of sex discrimination
* AT&T v. Hulteen (2009), which allowed corporations to discriminate against women who took maternity leave in calculating pensions
* Gross v. FBL Financial Services (2009), which made it easier for corporations to defend against age-discrimination suits
* Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. NLRB (2002), which helped corporations knowingly take advantage of undocumented workers
* Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker (2008), which arbitrarily reduced penalties to be paid by Exxon after it allowed a known alcoholic to captain the Exxon Valdez through the dangerous Prince William Sound, resulting in a catastrophic, 53-million-gallon oil spill
* Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc. (2009), which allowed corporate polluters to use cut-rate methods of minimizing toxic output
* Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council (2009), which allowed corporations to pour mining waste called "slurry discharge" directly into lakes despite EPA rules forbidding it
* Philip Morris USA v. Williams (2007), which limited the penalties paid by tobacco companies for causing millions of cancer deaths even when juries decided otherwise
* Citizens United v. FEC (2010), which gave corporations the ability to pour billions of dollars into elections for local, state, and federal office

"The right-wing voting bloc on the Supreme Court brought a pro-corporate political ideology to the bench," said Keegan. "Now they're acting on it. It's only natural for corporations to win some of the cases they bring to the Court. But the pattern of pro-corporate decisions made by this Court is unmistakable. The right-wing Justices on the Court have been forcing a pro-corporate ideology into the law. Americans who care about our Constitution and our democracy should be deeply disturbed by this trend."


http://www.pfaw.org/press-releases/2010/04/the-rise-of-the-corporate-court-how-the-supreme-court-putting-business-first

[BrklynLiberal]

1. We can thank the one time Corporate CEO and Supreme Court Justice, Lewis Powell, for this.

for more info Google "Powell Memo"

http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=9606

This was written in 2005, so it is a bit outdated, but a lot of what it says still applies..
I think the impact of the Powell memo was greater than this person believes...

The story of the Rise of the Right is the great fable in recent American politics, one that is endlessly revised as it is told and retold by its participants and by envious observers from the left bank. In recent versions, a central place in the story has been given to a memo written in 1971 by Richmond corporate lawyer (and future U.S. Supreme Court justice) Lewis Powell to a neighbor who was active in the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Powell's eight-page memo, titled “Attack on American Free Enterprise System,” was a call for American business to defend its interests against criticisms of capitalism emanating “from the college campus, the pulpit, the media, the intellectual and literary journals,” and particularly from Ralph Nader (whose model of public interest litigation and publicity was then at its height). Powell recommended to the chamber a number of strategies, including building a group of scholars-on-call to defend the system; monitoring and critiquing the media; and building legal organizations that could fight back in the courts.

The memo was circulated within Chamber of Commerce circles and became public after Powell's confirmation to the court, when journalist Jack Anderson unearthed it to question Powell's judicial temperament. After that, it seems to have been forgotten.

<snip>

[SocialistLez]

2. I was already skeptical that the Supreme Court was bought out.

"Orwell Rolls in His Grave" pretty much confirmed it.