Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Euro descendant borders and lines through indigenous lands are what should be outlawed.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:12 AM
Original message
Euro descendant borders and lines through indigenous lands are what should be outlawed.
Who was here first? Not white people.

I'm a white person who is fed up with America's treatment of ALL indigenous people.

When will it fucking end?

When?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nothing ends, Adrian.
Edited on Mon Apr-26-10 11:16 AM by Teaser
Nothing ever ends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Where does it start?
I understand the sentiment, but quite honestly, who do you think the "indigenous" people are? When do you become indigenous and stop being the invaders? Careful, because the druids are a bit concerned about your answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I luvs me some druids, but even the Celts
displaced/absorbed earlier people of Old Europe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. you should start with being angry at the Romans for killing and taking over the indigenous people
of Europe which preceded the take over of the Americas?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. People called Romanes they go the house
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. ...who were themselevs rarely indigenous for very long
It seems like people with sentiments like this define "indigenous" as "what it was like in about 1400" for no reason I can gather.

Ancient Egyptians were not indigenous. Romans were not indigenous. The British Empire were not indigenous. The Spanish, Portuguese, French empires neither.

Not to mention the many vicious indigenous American disputes and shifting territories that took place for hundreds (and probably thousands) of years in between the migration from Asia and the coming of the Europeans. Should teh Lipan or the Comanche decide the borders or even the indigenous ownership of the Southern Great Plains for example?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. When the Space Aliens arrive to drive us from our land...
At least that's what Stephen Hawking is thinking these days...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Although Europe has a history of being overrun by various tribes over and over
Edited on Mon Apr-26-10 12:52 PM by Cleita
through the millenniums, it seems the Americas were settled by people from northeast Asia. They didn't overrun other tribes but entered as the first settlers much as the Aborigines did in Australia. So I believe they have a stronger claim to these lands than any of the rest of us do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Which tribes though?
The idea that all the NA tribes just lived in peace and harmony and never stole land from each other by force much as the Europeans did is not historically accurate. How far back do we go to recognize a claim? If it's conquest that's the problem we'll have to go much further back than European invaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I never said they lived in peace and harmony all the time. I said they were the first
humans here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. But the topic was about borders. Which NA tribe sets those?
Edited on Mon Apr-26-10 01:26 PM by dmallind
Why is it any different having a European invader who took the land by force set a boundary and having, again just as one example, a Comanche invader who took the land by force set a boundary?

The fact is the current US also has a (pre- and post-European) history of various tribes invading and taking over land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Native Americans didn't have borders as a rule. They just coopted
territories that could be fluid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Yes - fluid by violently expelling other tribes. What's the difference again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Why don't you tell me being you are such an expert.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I'm the one saying there is no substantive difference
I wouldn't care any more or any less if somebody expelling me from my home by force of arms was a pasty white Anglo mutt like me or an ebony-skinned Masai tribesman. Would you? Why? Would it matter if your great great great grandfather lived closer to the Masai or Middlesex? It wouldn't to me, but I'm not the one claiming (fairly fleeting on the scale of history) antecedence is a valid criteria for who should decide borders or social structure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. The answer you want is in volumes of scholarly papers written on
the pre-columbian people of these continents and the impact of European contact on them and yet you want an answer here. It's all in the library if you really are interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. So whats your year of perfect harmony?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm not guilty of my father's sins, much less my great great great grandfather's
Nor do I claim that that which belonged to my great great great grandfather should have to be considered a rightful inheritance now belonging to me.

That kind of thinking is what keeps the Middle East and so many other areas of the world in so much turmoil.

When will it end? When people worry more about dealing with the status quo and more immediate history, trying to make everything better for everyone living now rather than worrying about who was someplace first long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recovered Repug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
15. Oh yes.
The "I was here first" argument. If playground rules aren't in effect, anarchy will reign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC