Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Servicemembers United calls on Obama to insert DADT repeal language in budget, NOW

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 05:43 PM
Original message
Servicemembers United calls on Obama to insert DADT repeal language in budget, NOW
The White House has been caught off guard by the fact that the standard line on DADT that they thought would satisfy the LGBT community for 2010 (i.e., the President already supports full repeal of DADT and that it's now out of his hands) is not working. The White House seems to have calculated that the LGBT community would simply not catch on to the nuanced fact that the President can and should still put repeal language into the defense policy transmittals that the administration sends over to the House and Senate Armed Services Committees each year for recommended inclusion in the National Defense Authorization Act. But now the community - from its elites to its grassroots activists to its non-political masses - is well aware of this possibility, and it is demanding that the President act.

The activists that interrupted the President's speech at the Boxer fundraiser in Los Angeles were not just calling for the President to support repeal. When the President responded as if this was all they were asking for, the activists followed up with a chorus of "Insert the language! Insert the language!" To this nuanced demand, the White House has yet to craft a sufficient response, and it is running out of time. Perhaps that's because the only sufficient response will be to comply. That, Mr. President, would be the right thing to do.

http://gay.americablog.com/2010/04/servicemembers-united-calls-on-obama-to.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. He won't! He finds LGBTs kinda yukky!
Anyone that cavorts with the likes of Rick "death penalty for gays" Warren is no friend of ours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hell, I find it kinda yucky. Insert it anyway....
I also find mushrooms kinda yucky. And similarly, I can't remotely imagine denying people who feel otherwise their rights to enjoy them to the fullest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ain't going to happen. He only talks.
We already know how much coffee that'll buy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. He all ready has the military stone walling with their "this needs to be studied" bullshit
Each service is conducting their own review with stacked panels. These panels also will include family members of military personnel to further guarantee stopping this in it's tracks. Panels are expected to take over 8 additional months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC