Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First veto: Stem cell research; Second veto: End the war; Third veto:?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 12:39 PM
Original message
First veto: Stem cell research; Second veto: End the war; Third veto:?
Hate crime bill. Bush vetos life, peace and love. What a bastidge!

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/05/04/MNG9SPKPT51.DTL&feed=rss.news

San Francisco Chronicle
Veto threat for federal hate crimes protection for gays

Carolyn Lochhead, Chronicle Washington Bureau

Friday, May 4, 2007



(05-04) 04:00 PDT Washington -- After the same-sex marriage fights that roiled the 2004 elections and knocked gay rights groups on their heels, advocates seemed poised with the Democratic seizure of Congress in November to enact federal civil rights laws they have sought for nearly two decades.

But four hours before House passage Thursday of a federal hate crimes bill that has languished since 1991, the White House issued a threat to veto the bill, which would be just the third veto of the Bush presidency.

"It makes it apparent to a lot of people," said Rep. Barney Frank, a gay Massachusetts Democrat, "that as long as you have George Bush as president, nothing that tries to promote fairness for gay and lesbian people has any chance."

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. anti-discrimination?
my guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. minimum wage is my guess
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. 1st: medical science...2nd:peace
3rd? My geuss is human rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, he's getting better, I guess. This veto only further solidifies
civil rights violations that will lead to horrendous inequality and discrimination, causing much personal suffering.

That's a bit of an improvement over his previous vetoes, which further solidifies horrendous suffering and mass death. I'd call that an improvement. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CPschem Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. quite a veto record the dipshit has.
anti-science and anti-peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rob H. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. But, but, but EVERY CRIME is a hate crime!
:sarcasm: even though a neocon asswipe actually said that to me on another forum. (What about jaywalking? Speeding? Driving with expired tags?)

Bush didn't support the James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Act when he was governor of Texas, either. (Emphasis added)

On May 6, 1999, (Byrd's oldest daughter, Renee) Mullins; her cousin, Darrell Verrett; state Rep. Senfronia Thompson, D-Houston; and a gay rights lobbyist met with Bush to lobby on behalf of the bill.

"I went in there pleading to him," Mullins says. "I said that if he helped me move it along I would feel that he hadn't died in vain ... Thompson said, 'Gov. Bush, what Renee's trying to say is, Would you help her pass the bill?' And he said, 'No.' Just like that."

"He had a nonchalant attitude, like he wanted to hurry up and get out of there," Mullins says. "It was cold in that room."

*snip*

Bush's opposition to the bill reportedly revolved around the fact that it would cover gays and lesbians. The governor's office "contacted the family and asked if we would consider taking sexual orientation out of the bill," Harris says. "And our answer was no, because the bill is for everybody. Everybody should be protected by the law."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC