Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pima County Sheriff, asked what solution to 'racist' law is, replies, 'The November election.'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 07:35 PM
Original message
Pima County Sheriff, asked what solution to 'racist' law is, replies, 'The November election.'
Edited on Wed Apr-28-10 07:38 PM by BurtWorm
:patriot:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/28/pima-county-sheriff-calls_n_555895.html




Pima County Sheriff Calls Arizona Law "Stupid," Will Not Enforce It (VIDEO)
First Posted: 04-28-10 04:59 PM | Updated: 04-28-10 05:11 PM


Columnist George Will is of the opinion that Arizona's police officers are capable of handling the task that the state's draconian new anti-immigration law drops into their laps. That is to say, they must do a better job at enforcing illegal immigration statutes, without racial profiling, and do so effectively enough to not get sued. Will said:

Probably 30 percent of Arizona's residents are Hispanic. Arizona police officers, like officers everywhere, have enough to do without being required to seek arrests by violating settled law with random stops of people who speak Spanish. In the practice of the complex and demanding craft of policing, good officers -- the vast majority -- routinely make nuanced judgments about when there is probable cause for acting on reasonable suspicions of illegality.

On the other hand, Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik, who I am assuming is something of a master of the "complex and demanding craft of policing" seeing as how he's been a policeman for over five decades, begs to differ. Per Amanda Terkel, Dupnik called the law "racist" and "disgusting" and "stupid" and, in his "nuanced judgment" could not be enforced without mandatory racial profiling. Dupnik's reckoning of the legal issue is that he's just as likely to be sued for racial profiling as he is for not doing enough racial profiling, so he's standing pat, and will not enforce the new law.

Asked by local news station KGUN9 what he thought the solution to the law was, Dupnik replied, "The November election."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. apart from the ridiculous lack of legal knowledge in the article
Edited on Wed Apr-28-10 08:18 PM by paulsby
"probable cause for acting on reasonable suspicions of illegality"
you don't have PC of RS. that's just way too meta and stupid

PC and RS are two different standards of evidence to believe the same thing

iow, if you have PC, you have RS and more. if you have RS , you only have RS.
just... well... lol

the article is spot on. george will, like most people, doesn't know much about actual policing, nor do most cop-o-crats, although pima county sheriff seems to have a good head on his shoulders.

line cops will NOT like this law, and it puts them in a very bad situation, damned if they do, damned if they don't, and accused of racial profiling no matter what, and for what cause.

and it will upset the relationship with the community, where hispanics especially will fear calling police or sticking around as witnesses etc. due to fear that the local cops will be "la migra" in disguise.

it's a bad law, poorly written.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC