Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FL women seeking abortions could face forced ultrasounds at own cost even when raped

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 02:51 AM
Original message
FL women seeking abortions could face forced ultrasounds at own cost even when raped
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/state/women-seeking-abortions-could-face-forced-ultrasounds-641338.html

Florida's Republican-dominated legislature is poised to pass a bill that would force any pregnant woman considering an abortion to first have an ultrasound - and pay for it - even if she was raped.

The measure, if signed by Gov. Charlie Crist, would result in one of the most restrictive abortion laws in the nation. It also would require a woman to view the ultrasound unless she signs a form saying she was not coerced into having the abortion.

Opponents say that even then, the bill may require women to hear a medical professional's description of the fetus from that ultrasound before having an abortion unless they can prove they have been raped, are a victim of domestic violence or became pregnant under other extreme circumstances.

But the measure's sponsor, Sen. Andy Gardiner, R-Orlando, disagreed.

"This says to me, in our interpretation, you sign this, you don't have to look at it, you don't have to see it, you don't have to hear about it," he said.

snip

Florida law already requires ultrasounds for abortions after the first trimester of pregnancy. But more than 90 percent of the procedures take place in the first trimester.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
harry_pothead Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'll translate for you - FL legislature says women can't be trusted to make this decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. If Crist wants cross-over votes from democrats as an Independent, he'll veto it with an
explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RockaFowler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. I am getting so sick of these Repukes
Where are the female Repukes when all of this is going on?? They are silent subservients. Just like those Males like it. We really need to create 2 different states. These yahoos in the Panhandle and killing the rest of this great state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The female Repukes know what to do...
They just go to the nearest state-line and find a doctor that will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sounds like Oklahoma?
Edited on Thu Apr-29-10 06:29 AM by Dont_Bogart_the_Pret
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wilmouth/2010/04/28/brian-williams-sees-highly-restrictive-abortion-laws-oklahoma

On Tuesday's NBC Nightly News, anchor Brian Williams characterized as "highly restrictive" two abortion related laws recently passed by the Oklahoma state legislature over the Democratic governor's veto. Neither of the measures would apparently ban abortion at any stage of pregnancy, as one law requires that an ultrasound of the unborn baby be performed and shown to a pregnant woman before an abortion could take place. On the April 27 show, Williams related:

In Oklahoma tonight, two highly restrictive abortion measures are now law. One requires women to undergo an ultrasound and listen to a detailed description of the fetus before getting an abortion. The second protects doctors from malpractice suits if they choose not to inform the parents of an unborn child that the fetus has birth defects. The governor had vetoed both measures last week, but today the legislature had enough votes to override those vetoes by the governor.


The Rachel Maddow show talked about this last night.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8235278
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. This is just evil.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC