Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking on CNN British Ex-Diplomat says WMD intelligence used was false

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:32 PM
Original message
Breaking on CNN British Ex-Diplomat says WMD intelligence used was false
Edited on Fri May-04-07 03:43 PM by Blackhatjack
British Diplomat says evidence was grossly exaggerated, and has written a book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Used False" boobies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Blair's government was "submissive"...
Edited on Fri May-04-07 03:34 PM by originalpckelly
:rofl:

Definitely a good little submissive sexually frustrated poodle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:36 PM
Original message
that maybe funny but the thought of moron* dressed in leather with
a whip is just too much for me.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
42. must go wash brain now after that visual ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Blair and Govt furious and will not comment"....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He is being interviewed on CNN right now..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
34. when will the Media Establishment wake the hell up!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Says intelligence was clear Iraq had nothing but a residual effect...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. He is addressing the Downing Street Memo, 'confirms what I am saying..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. He challenges his government to debate him and prove his book has inaccuracies...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oooo, I betcha Shrub is more angry than the Poodle!!!!
Is this a Friday news dump on Shrub for a change?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why do all these people wait until they can write a book
do they have no fucking shame?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. He just said he was too scared and too wedded to his job to speak out
Edited on Fri May-04-07 03:41 PM by napi21
before, and he's very sorry.

Personally, I think he was also afraid for his life! the "crime family" has a lot of dead people who crossed them and are now just a adot in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. So if you feel guilty why make money off it
Edited on Fri May-04-07 03:45 PM by Pawel K
I find all of this to be bullshit. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad the truth is starting to come out (as if we didn't know the truth before). But the fact these assholes only tell their story 4 years later after hundreds of thousands of lives have been lost and they tell it in a book they can sell is inexcusable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. He just mentioned David Kelly paid a great price because others did not speak out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. There is a prohibition on disclosing govt secrets in Britain, but once it went to Parliment he could
speak about it.

This is what I understood him to say. A paraphrase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. THis is only going to get better once Blair resigns...
I would expect there to be leaks from all over Britain regarding the false intelligence used to lie us into war with Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Did you catch his name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I did not. I don't recall his name being displayed.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Ok, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. And now the other side of the story
here comes Richard Perle to give us the "truth"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. Why does this stuff take YEARS to get out?
Some of us knew it when we were screaming at our teevees while Colin Powell was lying his @ss off.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. See my post above, Britain has a secrecy act ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. But, how much of a secret could it be if *I* knew better?
I hear what you're saying and do know about the secrecy act. But, f me. If they invoke the act,does that mean we all have to take a magnet to our brains?

It doesn't compute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. It's important more for the fact it is confirmation of what we know from a former govt official...
The way I understand the British State Secrets Act, he as a diplomat could not confirm this information unless and until it was requested and communicated to members of Parliment, which made it possible for him to comment on it.

He is out of government, and I suspect he could not have written the book and got it released while still employed as a diplomat.

Just my take...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. It's weird that way common people can know something
but officials have to jump through hoops before telling the truth. I see what you mean, I think.

And it just makes government seem archaic and out of step. Oh well, bureaucracies are like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Seems like a parallel situation to that of Sibel Edmonds....
She is gagged here in the States, and she cannot tell what she knows.

The most important tool in controlling the masses is to control the information they receive.

The Soviet Union arguably fell as a result of the breakdown in control of information available to the people there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. I was going to say the same thing
But then it occurred to me: David Kelly paid the highest price possible for attempting to blow the lid off this three (?) years ago. If I was thinking of doing the same, his "suicide" would scare me enough to make me think twice about coming forward.

These bastards have got it all in the bag, don't they? Lie and propagandize at will, hide the truth behind state secrets, and suicide the first person who speaks up to keep everyone else who might think about being a hero in line.

Some 30 years ago I read a book about the mafia called MURDER, INC. It seemed like fiction it was so horrifying, but it was all true. It absolutely chills me to see the comparison with our governments now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. I believe they killed Dr. Kelly, too.
I don't put anything beyond them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Dead men tell no tales...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. The fact he mentioned Dr. Kelly and regrets not speaking out before his death is impt
This fellow's best protection is to tell all as far and wide as possible.

His revelations may not be groundbreaking, but his confirmation of the truth will resonate with a public that wanted to believe Blair and his government had been straight with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. How is this "breaking" news?
haven't we known it for 4 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. See post explanation above....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
23. So, Blair really was a Poodle.
giving Poodles a bad name....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. IF the truth be known, there is bound to have been some extortion and blackmail going on...
The people at the top would have had the information needed to keep underlings in line and quiet.

I would not put extortion and blackmail past them.

Just like Tom Delay used to roam the halls, 'twisting arms' while votes were held open. It was rumored that Delay had a list of all the 'indiscretions' certain members of his party had engaged in and used that to change some votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
33. Blair could have been the new Sir Winston if he had followed the
path of truth, but for some inexplicable reason he glued himself to the liar Bush, even as he clearly learned that the facts were being manipulated. Blair is, therefore, just another smudge in the history of a great nation. There will always be an England, but Tony Blair will not have a statue dedicated to his honor...he is now a nobody in the history of the realm, which has given us great leaders as the Marlboroughs (including Churchill) and many great poets (never forgetting Shakespeare, but so many more) and original thinkers (Shaw and Russell and Newton) and the list goes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Blair will get his statue, as have all sorts of highly-placed scoundrels, thieves and traitors .
Edited on Fri May-04-07 05:14 PM by Benhurst
But with any luck, his will meet the same fate as Margaret Thatcher's.

Have they ever glued a new head on that monstrosity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
36. Will they pay attention to the Downing Street Memo now?
They intended to twist the intel to fit their war policy. How many years have we known they were lying? Now they need to be exposed, but the whistle blowers MUST BE PROTECTED. I hope this ex-diplomat is VERY, VERY careful.:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
37. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
38. FYI: His name is Carne Ross; I googled, but nothing yet. Wolfie
just mentioned DSM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
39. Catching it on rerun. Wolfie brings up the DSM!!!! So if Wolfie remembers the
DSM, why is he acting so surprised with this new(old)revelation????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
40. I have a suspicion that this ex-diplomat is going to reveal more soon...
the government has already challenged him and his book, and he just challenged the govt to debate him and show the evidence that proves his allegations are untrue.

He has thrown down the gauntlet.

Hope he is not 'accident prone.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Transcript now available
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC