branders seine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 05:43 PM
Original message |
Anyone watch the rapublican USA propagandafest on the History Channel? |
|
Gingrich, Giuliani, bloomberg, powell...they had every loser rapublican commentator set up like they were experts commenting on every scene, then the BofA commercials blended in seemlessly using the exact same set and production values and commentary style, with no break from the program...
Ironic how the glorious narrative they told focused mainly on the episodes in which ordinary working colonists did dirty work on behalf of wealthy merchants and landowners. I guess teabaggery really is a throwback to Boston Harbor...
|
sufrommich
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 05:44 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I'm watching it. It's well made and interesting. |
|
Different strokes, I guess.
|
Bacchus39
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. yeah, pretty good. the bank commercials are pretty tasteless though |
|
portraying them like they are part of the program.
|
Blue_In_AK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 05:50 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I watched the first one. |
|
I thought it was kind of interesting that President Obama introduced the series, saying that it was important for all Americans to know their history, or some such, and then, as you say, all these Republican assholes are doing the little talking interludes. NEWT GINGRICH??? Come on.....
|
Ardent15
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
Blue_In_AK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
I guess I did see a few Democrats in there, but I wish they had chosen different Republicans. At least they didn't use Sarah.
|
Hardrada
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. She would have been good on the beaver fur trade. |
branders seine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
OHdem10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. While I may not agree with Gingrich philosophically, he is smart |
|
and played a most important role in bringing the Republican Party out of the desert putting them in charge for lo' these last years. One could say he is the father of the 94 "Rout".
|
Ardent15
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. He's smart intelelctually, but he has no common sense |
|
And isn't as smart as he thinks he is.
|
mitchum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king |
|
Yes, Gingrich is an intellectual heavyweight in the republican party
|
randr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Reminded me of 50's propaganda movies |
|
Even had Bank of America sponsoring the whole thing as if the purpose of "America" was to create banking wealth. Very pro American aggression and a huge call out to the gun lobby.
|
branders seine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. and the use of the common people by the wealthy |
|
to pursue revolution, which was, ironically, positioned primarily as an economic war
it downplayed the vast wealth of most of the "founding fathers" though.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:38 AM
Response to Original message |