Archae
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 07:59 PM
Original message |
Is "Free Republic" a scam? |
|
I think it is. Jim Robinson rakes in tons of cash from his Freepathons, not to mention teh events they promote, yet the site itself looks like something that's almost no cost at all.
|
hughee99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:09 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Let's see, who do we know |
|
who continually supports politicians even though those very same politicians routinely screw them over at virtually every opportunity? Why should their online forums be any different then their elected officials?
|
denbot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:09 PM
Response to Original message |
2. The coservative base is a target for the biggest scam ever. |
|
From trickle down effect, to Sarah Palin, everyone takes advantage of freepers and their ilk.
|
TxVietVet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:09 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I went on the Freepers site a couple of times. |
|
They kept removing my posts. I guess they didn't like it when I was calling them stupid f*cking conservanazis. :kick:
|
BlueJazz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
16. For awhile, I held the record for being thrown off Freerepublic 17 seconds. They didn't... |
|
. ..like me calling them a pack of "Dumb Ugly Bags of Water"
:) :)
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:10 PM
Response to Original message |
4. $320,000/year from "Freepathons" alone |
|
And the site is using the same fucked up interface they started with all those years ago with absolutely no enhancements in the intervening time.
|
Ian David
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Not to mention the money Bush made California pay them when they sued. n/t |
Archae
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. I never heard about that. |
Ian David
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Some public official in California called FR a hate site. |
|
Edited on Thu Apr-29-10 08:23 PM by Ian David
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
17. That whole episode was another scam |
|
because Rim Job was posting entire articles verbatim on his site, got sued, and had to pay. That was how Bush kept the scam site alive.
It's outlived its usefulness now, which is why Freepathons last two out of every three months.
|
leeloo
(153 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
20. Ian David said the Freepers sued CA and Bush made CA pay..? |
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
25. Free Republic was about to go broke because of the judgement against them |
|
The episode where Bush told CA to pay up over the CA official calling it a hate site was the scam to keep the Freepers going when by rights they should have gone belly up over the LA Times judgment against them over copyright infringement.
|
leeloo
(153 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
27. OK i know FR is a scam,but do you have a link so i can post it elsewhere, |
|
Ian posted 3 links about bush and when i read them nothing mentions bush, actually one link is a DU poll,i post stuff on other websites and need evidence such as news stories,blogs etc... Saying it ain't so.......
|
leeloo
(153 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
13. Bush made them pay wow do you have the link? |
TxVietVet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. The freepers are a dumb lot. There was another bunch that was worse. |
|
I'll have to see if I can remember their website. One of them came on our anti-war forum and was accusing us of being nazis. I called him a conservanzi and showed him the 14 characteristics of fascism. It blew his mind. I wish I could remember their name. They got so rabid against one another they shut the site down for quiet a while. I'll have to see if I can find it.
If you think the freepers are ate up with the dumbass, these other guys were even worse. They were active on the freepers also.
If the freeper site is a scam, they deserve it. They need to get screwed. The main reason is that they think they know it all. You can't tell any of them anything. They know all the conservanazi lies and propaganda.
|
K8-EEE
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:14 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Well, everyone on it thinks GWB saved them from Saddam |
|
Who was just about to murder us in our beds with his massive WMD arsenals.
So, yeah, they're def a bunch of saps. Easy pickins for Jim Rob, although it seems like it took all week for the freep-o-meter thing to go from 81% to 82%!
|
Initech
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:15 PM
Response to Original message |
7. No it's a pyramid scheme. |
onehandle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:15 PM
Response to Original message |
agentS
(922 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Yes it's a scam, and they like it like that. |
|
The site's pathetically simple because most folks accessing it are on dialup 56K modems, using AOL or a local ISP from their shack in the mountains, making meth, no teeth, growing wacky beards like the UNAbomber.
Anything more complex than FR takes too long for them to load.
|
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:22 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Yes. But, the suckers would probably misspell "scam". |
Posteritatis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:26 PM
Response to Original message |
15. The visual layout of most high-traffic sites is the least expensive part |
|
I don't know what their expenses for bandwidth, staff, and thisthatandtheotherthing are, but no matter what the quality of the site's layout that would be a drop in the bucket expensewise.
|
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:33 PM
Response to Original message |
18. I wouldn't call it a scam |
|
More like "heavily subsidized", thanks to the sugar-daddy who ALWAYS rushes in at the last minute to keep that site going.
That sugar-daddy always seems to find value in it, so it doesn't seem to him like money wasted.
I think there's some saying about fools and money, but I can't remember it right now.
|
TheCowsCameHome
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:37 PM
Response to Original message |
19. I think it's a cesspool....... |
|
......full of you-know-what.
|
Archae
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:39 PM
Response to Original message |
21. I expect the right-wing lurkers to be jumping on my butt soon. |
|
Hiya Stan! You too.
Any bets as to how long until one of the right-wingers, including the Freepers themselves, attack me?
|
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:40 PM
Response to Original message |
progressoid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 09:13 PM
Response to Original message |
23. It's not different from any other RW operation. |
GoneOffShore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Kind of like asking "Does Ratzinger protect pedophiles?" |
chollybocker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 09:31 PM
Response to Original message |
KonaKane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message |
28. The entire conservative movement is a scam. |
|
And always has been. Ask Sarah, who even in her glacierbilly dumbfuckery figured out how to fleece the teabagging faithful with her bloated speaking fees and her stupid book.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:10 AM
Response to Original message |