Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I am not a conspiracy theorist, however I have a problem with this oil spill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:43 AM
Original message
I am not a conspiracy theorist, however I have a problem with this oil spill
it just seems strange to me that thru all of the controversy about drilling off shore, that on the very week that Pres. Obama opens up drilling off shore, we get an "accident" and explosion,, seems way to coincidental to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gemerally if the sentence begins with "I am not a conspiracy theorist" you are a conspiracy theorist
It is just like
"I am not racist but...."
"I don't hate gay people however ..."
"I got nothing against Mexicans but ..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Bull shit,,,You could say the same about the Iraq war...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Ok so who blew up the rig?
A) BP blew up their own multi billion dollar (rented) rig resulting in loss of billions more in oil and billion more in enviromental damage. The net "gain" being less support for future drilling which means less profits?

b) Some environmentalist ninja swam 30 miles offshore without being detected climbed on board the rig and blew it up with "magic". The net "gain" being environmental destruction on a scale not seen since Valdez spill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I didn't say I had the answer,, just the question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. "but" is called the eraser word...it erases anything before it.
as you point out....
FYI...Limbaugh IS spreading the idea that "liberuls" *somehow* caused the explosion because Obama
opened drilling.

Actually, there are various news reports that Haliburton delayed putting a cap on the well head when it was
cementing something down there.....I suggest a google for it. I was glued to news reports most of yesterday and that floated by the news feed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. "But" is nowhere in my post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #21
50. But however, 'however' means precisely the same thing.
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 11:37 AM by Matariki
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. When you have the dicks company
involved there is no telling the truth of this. Sounds like the Halliburton crew didn't cement the hole right and a big bubble of highly explosive gas is behind this. I doubt that anyone on the drilling rig even had a chance to say fuck, shit, hell or whatever expletive they may or may not use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. You are probably right Okie, just seems to convenient for me,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Convenient for who?
Who gains from this spill?

Environmentalists - ah nope
BP - not unless losing $26 billion in market cap is "gaining".
Republicans - not really when most are also in favor of drilling.
The Sea life - not unless they are going to start a hydrocarbon economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Opec,, Saudia Arabia, Venezuela, and many others that sell us oil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zazen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #16
30. someone who was shorting oil?
I don't think we should silence someone who's raising a question many others have probably thought but felt it was impolitique to raise.

It could have no explanation--no meaningful cause. It could be the result of Haliburton/KBR greed and insensitivity to life. . . the same ones who who did such inept electrical work in Iraq that soldiers were shocked when using water from the faucet.

But there's nothing wrong with asking the question about whether this was deliberate by someone. Lazer47 doesn't seem to be advocating for any particular complex theory tied to Bilderbergs and Bohemian Grove and alien abductions--s/he is simply raising the question. I'd assume a few people in the FBI and CIA have raised it. That's their job. Why can't we?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mother Smuckers Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #16
48. Not really, oil is totally fungible; you have no way to know where the carbon atoms in your tank
started out...Mexico, Middle East, Alaska or Pennsylvania...any or all plus lots of others. And Opec
doesn't "sell" oil, it's a sort of consortium or cartel of about a dozen countries, only one of which
is in the Western Hemisphere, I believe - Venezuela. There are hundreds of producers that are not members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, I think that you can rule out BP deliberately blowing up it's own platform
So unless you think that some renegade environmentalists came on board and blew up the platform, I think we can call it coincidence, or better yet, karma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. they were only renting the platform...karma/koinkydink is probably correct
renting it for 1,000,000 a day.....oil must be pretty profitable, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. Yup and now BP (or BP insurance company) owes Transocean a mere ...
$350 million for the lost rig.
Combine that with 6 million barrels spilled = $480 million worth of lost oil.
Environmental cleanup costs may be another $1 billion.
Figure another month or two before they get oil cut off = another $480 - $960 million worth of lost oil.
Likely Obama EPA will score some points with a "big" fine say another $100 million

BP is going to lose big on this one all because it isn't "profitable" to install a $600,000 backup device to close the well. Sometimes capitalists are too stupid to even see that regulation can make MORE MONEY. Had BP been "forced" by EPA/DOE to pay an extra $600,000 and install a acoustic switch (backup method to close well in an accident) it would have saved them $1 - $3 billion.

$600,0000 vs $3 billion. Price nice return on investment for that safety device. That is just looking at it in pure $$$$ terms and ignoring the PR value and environmental value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
52. I read yesterday something that someone here posted
or it was in a link I went too from here but they were talking about the 'cementing in' and how that is likely what happened. They use cement to seal this pipe/apparatus and cement being what it is it sometimes fails, cracks, and when it does at these pressures you have what we have here. Likely a huge bubble of highly explosive gas rose to the surface and the rig happened to be in its way and the rig being what it is, a drilling rig, makes sparks that could set the gas/air mixture off. I doubt seriously if anyone on the rig had an inkling they were fixing to die it all happened so fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here.. Let me help you adjust that. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. I was kidding someone in another thread
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 08:49 AM by Robb
....that it's aaaaalllll part of Obama's secret plan. First you authorize drilling, then you order the CIA to bomb an oil rig and back out of it. Win-win!

Triangular 9-dimensional checkers, or something. :D

Edited to add a verb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. Oh..wait.. you might be onto something there.
He used HARRP, they shot a beam at the well, it blows, it has just been announced the WH has said no
NEW drilling until the cause is determined.
By job, that 's it. Obama gets to be a closet environmentalist without losing the oil money lobby support.

Damn...he IS good.

Chess player indeedy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Other than the massive enviromental damage.
Right? :)

Kinda like being afraid to risk your money in stockmarket so you burn it all instead.
Now you no longer have anything to risk of losing all your money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #22
39. HAARP is the perfect addition to this thread...
very nicely done :applause:

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #39
46. * curtsy*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #22
44. look at the footage..chemtrails prominently whisping above the rig
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. It is called a fortuitous accident...if you can call a massive rape of the ecosystem...
in the gulf fortuitous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klukie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. Ah..I would just chalk it up to Mercury in Retrograde....
Shit tends to break around this time....maybe Obama looked to the stars for some help when he was planning the week to open up the offshore drilling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChickMagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. Pardon me
You happen to be a conspiracy theorist butt. Just like a skeptic butt. Or a not racist butt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
15. oh for the love of a modicum of intelligence
which is entirely absent from your op.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. So whats new,, I haven't shown intelligence since '72 and my last
trip to 'Nam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Actually, several others have commented that Gaia is getting her own back.
THAT is a concept I have been comfortable with for a long long long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoNothing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #23
31. Wrong
It's the Flying Spaghetti Monster. We have offended him with insufficient meatball sacrifices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #31
45. Ramen to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #23
37. cutting off her nose to spite her face?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
20. Progressives did it to make a point that we should not drill?
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 09:00 AM by stray cat
its as good as those we come up with against the right I guess. People love conspiracy theories....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
24. lihop or mihop?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
26. And a few people on the right fringe are suggesting sabotage by liberals
The symmetry is almost perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
27. Yeah, I guess BP must be in on it - they are about to fork over a lot of money.
BP’s chief executive says, 'We are taking full responsibility for the spill and we will clean it up' –Reuters

http://twitter.com/BreakingNews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #27
47. Just what Exxon said.
And we are still waiting for justice on that incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
28. This is something that could have happened at any time.
We don't know the exact circumstances.

But this has always been the risk.

The administration was cynical and stupid to embrace a policy of expanded "exploration."

The timing could not have been worse for them.

But shit happens.

And they should have known better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
29. With that kind of power who needs God?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. THEY are doing God's work, don'tcha see.
It all fits now ( scribbling madly on the blackboard)......

See, it was an oil "rig"...and "rig" means they had the game.... "rigged".
So they took out the dead peasants insurance on the workers, and insurance on the rig
( those pesky cdswappy things) and asked the socialist government for help
( need more chalk here,,wait a minute)......
and that means the state comes in.
see, the STATE !!!
NOW who else was around back in the day when the State took over...
Yes ! .Hitler !!!!

yeah....makes sense now :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. yup, you learned 'good' from the chalkboardster
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #34
53. Hahahaha!
That was excellent and gets the prize!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
32. Probably woudn't have happened if Bush/Cheney hadn't prevented appropriate regulations.
Wake the fuck up, man. This was bound to happen. Greed and profit motive overwhelmed safety and common sense. Happens every fucking time.

That's no conspiracy. That's the fact, Jack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
33. You are a conspiracy theorist just admit it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
36. Here's your Offshore Drilling Conspiracy:


Right Here:




CAUSE has met EFFECT


The CAUSE was carelessness due to greed and the EFFECT is another clusterfuck for the Gulf states.

There you go.


Now, the woo woo among us believe it is a time of instant karma, so to speak, but that's for another thread...





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
38. The men behind the fence on the grassy knoll have found gainful employment
further proof the economy has turned the corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
40. I hear ya! I also heard a rumor a sea turtle was seen leaving the scene on the back of a dolphin
Both are being sought for questioning but it's suspected they've slipped into international waters where we have no jurisdiction.

I knew, eventually, there'd be hell to pay for our actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
41. .
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 09:56 AM by Lone_Star_Dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
42. Occam's Razor:
The lack of strong safety regulation and the lack of enforcement of what regulation there is means a disaster waiting to happen. Yes, it was a coincidence that it happened after the President's offshore drilling order.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
43. Sometimes nature's timing is spot-on
Given the extreme conditions that occur deep underwater, plus all the seismic activity going on underseas, I am kinda surprised it hasn't happened sooner...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #43
54. Wonder why the hell the admin is sending in SWAT teams?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
49. Another timely RW talking point on DU
:puke:

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
51. Sorry but Haliburton is being looked at as the culprit for their shoddy work.
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 11:44 AM by Hansel
They poured the cement that anchored the rig and was suppose to prevent gas leakage. Just like their shoddy work in Iraq, the cement crumbled and the gas leaked through. That is the preliminary findings.

It's quite easy to believe this because of Haliburton's record of shoddy work resulting in the deaths of American soldiers and the crumbling of school, hospital and barrack structures. They try to do things on the cheap in order to suck as much money out as possible.

Maybe the coincidence of the timing was more about Mother Nature trying to make a point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC