Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

...psssst...Obama didn't cause the oil spill...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:35 AM
Original message
...psssst...Obama didn't cause the oil spill...
...and word has it he's re-examining the whole offshore drilling thing.

Just FYI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Damn you Fartbama! Damn you to hell!
*shakes fist*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. No, but he ordered the CIA bomb specialists to do it.
I have it on authority from the reverse vampires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:39 AM
Original message
In cooperation with the Rand Corporation
...we're through the looking-glass here, people...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seneca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Obviously using the same explosives tested on the moon
The moon is where they *always* test oil-rig-destroying explosives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
37. Man, if he's THAT devious I'm REALLY glad I voted for him!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Haven't you heard? He's failed to clean up the oil in a timely fashion
The economic and ecological damage being experienced, and that yet to be experienced, from this disaster is all on his shoulders. Really, it's true!





:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Just as bad as his decision to invade Iraq
Wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. His invasion of Iraq wouldn't have been bad if he'd not prematurely pulled troops from Afghanistan
Thus letting Osama bin Laden escape when he was pinned down in Tora Bora. What was he thinking trying to wage two wars at once?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Thats what the local paper is portraying
he didn't act fast enough. It's bullshit and we all know it but there are those who watch the likes of cnn and fox and those a holes believe anything thrown out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. They're attempting to exploit the emotions of those impacted by this disaster
It will work on some but not all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:40 AM
Original message
No he didn't cause this spill --
but he damned well DID overturn the ban on offshore drilling, which would certainly lead to future spills.

As for his "re-examining the whole offshore drilling thing" -- easy as pie to say (just like there must be a public option). Color me impressed when he signs a bill/EO reinstating the ban he just overturned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. Actually what the President will do is WAIT, GET the FACTS, then
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 11:50 AM by NJmaverick
CAREFUL consider his position in light of the new events and facts. If drilling can't be done with reasonable safety it will not happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. Thats pretty much why I voted for him in the first place
He has the balls, if you will, to change his mind as he becomes more 'learned', again if you will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
23. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
33. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
41. FACT blech blah garble TRUTH bitch smug yech REALITY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. ???
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
24. No, he did not
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 11:51 AM by Lone_Star_Dem
Tuesday April 20 was the first day the meetings on the environmental impact studies which he did approve. That's what he did. He opened the door for environmental impact studies. The first meeting took place in Houston on the same day as the explosion on the rig in the Gulf.

Have a look at this article.

Oil industry seeks fast offshore study

Energy industry representatives on Tuesday asked the government agency responsible for leasing offshore lands for drilling to expedite and even expand an environmental impact study of the effects of seismic surveying off the Atlantic coast.

That work will allow geological data to be collected in an area off limits to exploration and drilling for more than two decades.

The U.S. Minerals Management Service on Tuesday hosted in Houston the first of 13 meetings to gather public comments for a so-called programmatic environmental impact statement that will look at the potential harm caused by seismic work to marine life and ocean habitats, as well as alternatives and mitigation measures.

The meetings — 12 others are scheduled in six cities on the East Coast this month — come only weeks after President Barack Obama unveiled a plan to lift an offshore drilling ban for much of the Eastern Seaboard and other areas.

When the study is done, scientists should be able to begin collecting and analyzing geologic data so that the government can proceed with lease sales and drilling for oil and natural gas, as well as a host of other activities, from siting wind turbines to excavating sand and gravel.

Read more: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/6967988.html


Guess what? I don't think big oil is going to get the rushed study they wanted. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. He over turned the ban.
Plain and simple. The door is now open and the bum's rush will begin.

If George W. Bush had done this VERY SAME THING DU would be all over this for the bullshit it is.

And you damned well know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Why are you ignoring the facts that you were just given?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. I have lasted 8+ years --
but the time has finally arrived.

Congratulations, you just popped my ignore cherry! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. That's not an answer to the question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #35
44. I know the door is not open.
That's why they were pushing last week to rush the studies. They can only begin if the the studies show low impact. After that the door would be open.

You're mistaking me for someone whose in favor of offshore drilling. I'm not. None of it meets my standards of safety and environmental responsibility. That doesn't mean I'm going to twist facts spew spittle out my mouth in outrage over these studies. That's just not my style. I will admit I was much more nervous about them last week, before the explosion and subsequent spill. Now I expect they may have a better chance of being given the time and attention they require to be valid.

You know what else? I fully expect to see tighter regulations after this disaster. There are some pretty simple things which could be done that could make our current rigs less dangerous and cleaner. The only problem is no one has given a damn about anything except profits for the past 10-years. It's a damn shame it takes a ecological disaster to get things done which should have been done a decade ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. No way!
I am sure he caused the spill and ordered that there would be no clean up efforts! :tinfoilhat:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. Oh yes he did
So there:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. yeah well.... I bet he flew over it and then ignored it.
Presidents do that, ya know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. LOL... Good one
Wish I thought of that one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:44 AM
Original message
I wouldn't think he did. It is very bad timing for him, however.
Glad to see he's walking his position on it back and reconsidering in light of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
11. Kudos to him for his rethinking of Offshore drilling as well. Hope he puts a
permanent lid on off shore drilling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
15. Teabagger Twitterer starting sabotage meme
for her 47,000 followers

http://twitter.com/andilinks

Put eco-alinsky's on the defensive, presume oil rig to be eco terror.

Oil rig explosion too convenient for coincidence, sabotage evidence forthcoming.

Follow the money: who gains from oil rig explosion? Besides Iran & the hard left?



Please counter her vile statements.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. Although you could argue everyone on DU did because they use the oil drilled
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
17. According to HuffPo David Axelrod told GMA that "no additional drilling has been authorized and none
Will until we find out what has happened here."

UNTIL.

IOW, once they know what happened off LA, they are still willing take a chance that (1) it won't happen again, and (2) some OTHER unforeseen problem won't occur the next time and do to the middle Atlantic and FL coastlines what the current spill is doing to the LA coastline.

That's our president, nothing if not pragmatic about the environment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
18. The "Treehuggers" did it
as there are NO trees on beaches or out at sea to damage. I used my logical "raisn'in" sills on this one.

:rofl:
god the stupid hurts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
19. no, but lawmakers enable them
let's hope this incident sobers him up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
21. Why is the media referring to this as a "spill"?
The word "spill" portrays this disaster as a short term clean-up, like mopping up a glass of spilled milk.

It's a continuous, non-stopping flow; BIG difference!

I think a lot of people hear the word spill and don't appreciate the enormity of this event.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greencharlie Donating Member (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
22. of course...
but good news or bad... the POTUS wears it around the neck. He wears improving employment numbers and he'll wear the oil spill... that's just the way it is. Someone will say that there wasn't a spill like this when Shrub was in office... lol. It's all politics... unfortunately, and they're ALL politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
25. No, But He IS GOING TO PERSONALLY CAP THE WELL!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishbulb703 Donating Member (492 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
27. Wrong. He is defending his drilling policy. Stop supporting a corporatist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I see your link and raise you
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 12:02 PM by WilliamPitt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishbulb703 Donating Member (492 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I'll call.
There's no way to prevent oil rig spills and explosions without drastically increasing expenses for BP, and ExxonMobil, etc. So I bet it won't happen. And that's not even mentioning the rigs still there that were installed in the 60s and 70s.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Nice link I think you nailed it with this quote
"The administration's offshore oil and gas plan proposes a thoughtful, scientifically grounded process for determining which new areas on the outer continental shelf are appropriate for exploration and development, and for assessing the potential risks and benefits of development in areas that are being explored,"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
29. Shill, Baby, Shill!
of course he did, he's a corporatist. haha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
32. LOL
It's really sad that you have to remind DUers about this truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
34. Yes he did. You just don't understand the complexity of 8th dimesional chess. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
38. ...psssst...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. Now THAT is the damned truth.
Too bad many here are so happily carrying that rancid bucket of water for O on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tailormyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
39. Good and perhaps he will reverse his very bad decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
40. I notice that on threads like this...
I notice that on threads like this, one has merely to believe a contrary position to someone else to get labeled a shill, a corporatist, a sell-out, etc.

I see a lot of dogma in my church, but I see a lot more here. Although Mr. Pitt may not be aware of it, his OPs usually result in a wonderful petri dish full of cultures...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
42. mrs alan greenspan wants to know if the adm did enough.....?
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 12:37 PM by spanone
'there's a growing controversy'.....she says

george stephanapolous asked david axelrod if this was going to be Obama's katrina......FUCK ME
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quezacoatl Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
48. And it's not a natural disaster. It's corporate Katrina.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
49. Yeah, I hear that it was some lady named Hallie Burton.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
50. Who said he did? I must have missed that.
What he did was triangulate on the issue, thus robbing the Democrats of an opportunity to stand clearly against this sort of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC