Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sherrod Brown: Let's break up the Big Banks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:38 AM
Original message
Sherrod Brown: Let's break up the Big Banks
Let's keep banks from growing too big to regulate
By Sherrod Brown
Friday, April 30, 2010; A19


Wall Street executives and newspaper editorial boards argue that it's not size but the systemic risk and the interconnectedness of "too big to fail" banks that matter <"Bailing out of bailouts," editorial, April 25>.

They are wrong. Too big to fail is simply too big. It's not a choice between competing options. The foundation of the argument that we can always understand and recognize risk is about as sturdy as the mezzanine tranche of a subprime securitization.

Three years ago -- before some of our nation's biggest financial institutions put our economy on the brink of collapse -- this argument would have carried more weight. But after millions of jobs and homes have been lost and trillions of dollars in savings have been destroyed, we must recognize that regulatory hubris is a dangerous thing.

Two years ago -- after failing to detect or address growing risk in the financial sector -- the Bush administration stepped in to save those institutions deemed "too big to fail." By intervening to save some banks but not others, the federal government essentially set a size threshold. While all of the institutions that foundered in 2008 were tightly woven into the fabric of our economy, some were big enough to shatter our economy. Those institutions received bailouts and the smaller institutions were allowed to fold, taking countless small businesses and jobs with them.

The Wall Street reform bill that is before the Senate, now that Republicans have ended their filibuster, will make important changes to our laws to provide for the orderly liquidation of these trillion-dollar banks if necessary. Those changes are important but not sufficient. <snip>

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/29/AR2010042902358_pf.html

Too big to fail is too big to live. Break 'em up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. When even Paul Volcker supports it, it's not a radical concept. It's common sense.
I hope they do this, but I'm not optimistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm not optimistic either. Too many sell outs in the party, today
But I appreciate ones like Brown who are trying to bring it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sherrod is not one of them
He is still one of peoples Senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
art of compromise Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Common sense defeated
by huge money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Too big to fail means to big to be allowed to exist.
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 04:59 PM by Odin2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. Thank you Sen Brown for having the guts to call for this. knr nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Morbius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. Half a dozen banks control some 60% of the nation's economy.
I suspect that even the bank of the United States that Jackson broke up didn't control so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC