Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Suggestion of New Legislation that would address Corp Responsibility in event of oil spills...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:45 PM
Original message
Suggestion of New Legislation that would address Corp Responsibility in event of oil spills...
In the event that a corporation is granted the right to operate an offshore oil drilling rig and an oil spill occurs, then the CEO, and board of directors, of the corporation shall be required to PERSONALLY arrive on site of the spill and engage in the clean up efforts until all the spilled oil has been removed and/or dispersed. Any CEO or member of the board of directors who fails to comply with this statute shall be subject to a PERSONAL civil fine of $1 million dollars per day, and said corporation shall be subject to a CORPORATE fine of $10mil dollars per day, until ALL THE SPILLED OIL has been removed and/or dispersed.

Personal and Corporate responsibility needs to be imposed in order to properly incentivize these decisionmakers to take appropriate action.

Of course the civil fines should be increased for each day they do not comply with this statute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think this is a fine idea, but doesn't address the real problem.
Extracting oil will inevitably have accidents. The ecological and environmental damage cannot be valued monetarily. We need to enact legislation that will lessen the potential and severity of the inevitable accidents. We should also work towards not putting oil rigs in environmentally sensitive areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree with your analysis, but this would help in the transition away from offshore rigs...
It appears in this case that the operators saved $500,000 by not installing an automatic cutoff valve.

We need to make sure the people at the top know they will get it personally and corporately if they don't take responsibility for making those rigs as safe as possible, and make them weigh the consequences if they do not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC