Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chambers wins appeal over removal as US Parks Police Chief: Obama admin continuing bush prosecution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 02:37 PM
Original message
Chambers wins appeal over removal as US Parks Police Chief: Obama admin continuing bush prosecution
Main Charge Against Chief Chambers Thrown Out as Protected Whistle Blowing

Washington, DC — The legal saga of former U.S. Park Police Chief Teresa Chambers took yet another turn, as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit today upheld her status as a whistleblower and threw out the main charge used to justify her removal in 2004. This is the second time this appellate court has ruled in her favor and her case is now remanded back to see if any of the lesser charges remaining justify disciplinary action against her.

Chambers, who had been the police chief in Durham, NC, was selected by the Bush administration following a nationwide search in 2002 as the first female leader of the oldest uniformed police force in federal service. In late 2003, Chief Chambers gave an interview to the Washington Post in which she confirmed dangerously low staffing levels. Three days after her interview was published, she was ordered to surrender her gun and badge, placed on administrative leave, and ordered not to speak any further with the media. After leaving her on administrative leave for 7 months, the Interior Department acted to terminate her, citing her interview as disclosing “law enforcement sensitive” information...

Thus far, the Obama administration had argued the same positions put forward by the Bush officials who went after Chief Chambers. Even though some prominent Obama officials had cited the Chambers case as the epitome of excess information suppression during the Bush years, thus far there has been no change in posture or policy either with respect to this case or the broader question of when and how security problems can be ventilated.

http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=1336

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good for Chambers. I thought it was bad enough that Obama's DOJ gave protected status to
the criminal Bush Administration, but it never occurred to me that that protection also extended to prosecuting BushCo's victims. But I was wrong: If Bush's DOJ would stoop to it, so will Obama's DOJ.

Such hope! Such change! Such transparency! NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. disgusting! it ceases to shock any more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Obamas DOJ
Most of it is still Bushes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. k n r nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. K and R
the Obama "justice" department hard at work protecting criminals and prosecuting truth tellers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC