Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tier 5: Congress Sends Mixed Signals About Adding More Weeks Of Unemployment Benefits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 03:31 PM
Original message
Tier 5: Congress Sends Mixed Signals About Adding More Weeks Of Unemployment Benefits
Excerpt from Huffington Post:

Both the House and Senate have passed measures extended eligibility for existing benefits through the end of the year, but the measures need to be reconciled and voted on again in each chamber. Reid's office has said that that will happen before the end of May, which is when the current stopgap extension will expire. When asked about adding a Tier 5, members of Congress typically say they need to focus on getting the the full-year extension finished before adding extra weeks.

Aside from Baucus's insistence that it shouldn't be done, the most definitive statement about Tier 5 has come from Sen. Tom Coburn, the Oklahoma Republican who in the name of deficit reduction obstructed the most recent effort to reauthorize the existing 99 weeks of benefits.

"We have 99 weeks of unemployment compensation out there right now -- and we're gonna move that to 103, and then we're going to move it even further," Coburn said in March. Congressional leaders declined to comment on adding weeks.

Every utterance about Tier 5 is closely tracked by the unemployed, who have formed several communities online where they analyze what's happening in Washington -- and discuss how they might influence it. One enterprising layoff victim has been encouraging her fellow unemployed to bombard D.C. offices with faxed resumes.


More
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who the hell is unrec'ing this?
Why would anybody be against helping the long-term unemployed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Love Bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. That doesn't sound like mixed signals to me. That sounds like "no."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not so sure about that
It depends on the senator or representative.

More and more pressure is going to have to be put on Congress to do something about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Do they want people in the streets?
k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC