Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh. My. God. This cannot be a coincidence. Halliburton buys top oil well firefighting company.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:59 PM
Original message
Oh. My. God. This cannot be a coincidence. Halliburton buys top oil well firefighting company.
3 weeks ago.....


http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/investing/halliburton-snaps-up-boots-and-coots/19435689/

The company certainly has a distinguished history. It has been critical in dealing with many well fires, including those from Iraq's 1990 invasion of Kuwait. But given its relatively small size, Boots & Coots has been at a disadvantage. As a result, the stock price has been mostly lackluster over the years.


Boots & Coots has two core businesses. First, there is Pressure Control, which involves prevention and risk-control services for oil- and gas-well fires and blowouts. A key to this area was the acquisition of John Wright, which developed sophisticated technologies to measure well integrity.

Next, Boots & Coots has a Well Intervention division, which helps enhance production for oil and gas operators. This business is likely to benefit nicely from the trend toward unconventional resource plays (such as extracting energy from shale). Boots & Coots greatly expanded this division with the acquisitions of Oil States International and StassCo.

snip

According to its latest earnings report, Halliburton is upbeat about the prospects for 2010. Actually, it looks like there will be a rebound in North America because of increased demand and rig counts. At the same time, it appears that Halliburton is gaining more market share from its struggling rivals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wait so Halliburton contracts to repair these oil wells and then
they contract to put out explosions and fires? Anyone smell anything funny?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Where there's Halliburton there's fire!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Classic marketing: Create the problem and sell the solution n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Fits right in with the protection rackets their (former?) boss likes to run. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felinetta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. I also smell cover-up. Will this company figure a way to make sure it isn't
Halliburton's responsibility.  Will they say they are not
guilty of anything. 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. so halliburton does shoddy work, cause well to blow up and sink
then buys company specializing in oil well fires and gets paid to put their fire out. Sounds about right as things go these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Makes me think of the Iraq/Kuwait War during the GWB administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. What else are you gonna do when term limits don't allow you to start Wars- For Profits, anymore?
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 10:38 PM by AzDar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's like living in Comic Book Land


when you start to dig a little deeper, isn't it?

Where's the SuperHero to rescue us?


:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. So Can We Assume Their Might Be A Lot More Oil Well Disasters In The Near Future?
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 11:06 PM by Beetwasher
I think we ought to be able to make that assumption.

It's at least a working theory. Let's see how it pans out.

Nice catch! I'll be watching!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. It would lead me to think we will have no additional regulation in our
future, which will lead to further failures of these platforms by the tiny financial shortcuts they take, which will inevitably lead to further accidents requiring cleanup.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Then You Haven't Been Paying Attention
If you think there will not be more regulations after the aftermath of the spill in the Gulf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Maybe
I guess we'll get some token regulations added, most likely with loopholes large enough you could tow an oil rig through.

I'm not holding my breathe for any serious regulation to come of this event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. You're Biased
So really, yr opinion is irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. I suppose I am a bit biased from watching 30 years
of deregulation and corporate cronyism. My bias is based on precedent, not hope. Irrelevant as it may or may not be.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Morbius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. So, youse wanna buy "fire insurance" or what? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morning Dew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. "Sure would be a shame if somethin' happened to your beautiful oil field." n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. Halliburton bought out B&C a long time ago.
RIP Red Adair
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moosepoop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Really? When?
According to this (dated April 9, 2010), the merger isn't supposed to happen until this summer.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/halliburton-establishes-new-product-service-line-announces-agreement-to-acquire-boots-coots-and-combine-with-current-assets-2010-04-09?reflink=MW_news_stmp

Under the merger agreement, Boots & Coots stockholders will receive $3.00 per share for each share of Boots & Coots common stock they hold, comprised of $1.73 in cash and $1.27 in Halliburton common stock, subject to election, proration features and an exchange ratio based on Halliburton's five-day average share price prior to closing as further described in the merger agreement. The Boards of Directors of both Halliburton and Boots & Coots have approved the transaction, which is expected to close in the summer of 2010, subject to regulatory approvals, approval by Boots & Coots' stockholders and other conditions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #25
34. Oops, my bad. I consulted my "all things Halliburton" guy.
He said that B&C and KBR have been in partnership for decades but were never actually the same company. He said, this is why you never seen one without the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlancheSplanchnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. This should probably be mass mailed to journalists everywhere and hope there's a REAL
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 11:21 PM by BlancheSplanchnik
professional somewhere who gets it.


really stomach turning.......
wow
.
.
.
.
.


I feel a little shell shocked, actually. Very, seriously. Shell shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. An interesting correlation that warrants investigation, but correlation does not insure causation.
Let's not jump into Limbaugh like accusations without evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. No, in a normal main street ethical thinking way... It is ridiculous. Its unthinkable
to cause such devastation within your neighborhood just because... However, this is Dick Chaney's baby. AND nothing would surprise me in the slightest. One side takes short cuts, the other side insures payment on clean up. Big Oil has got to be busted up. Its the reason we are in two wars we don't belong in... Saddam was a sadistic bastard installed back in the day (remember the Rumsfeld pic)... When he wouldn't play with the oil cartel of OPEC, the oil boys were pissed off. They wanted to increase the price of oil and couldn't when Saddam changed the price every other day. The whole kuwait invasion was about Kuwait stealing oil from Iraq's pipe lines.... Sr. Bush indicated that he'd look the other way while Saddam took care of business.... AND lied... kind of like that "read my lips, no new taxes" shit he pulled.

These top ass holes are all about power achieved mainly thru money and that whole cause the effect, push for a big reaction... AND then we lose our constitution. I'm not saying it was on purpose... but if the company takes short cuts and dose shoddy work, then its eventually going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Wouldn't surprise me either, but Kablooie is right
It could just be a coincidence. Presence of a motive is not sufficient in itself to prove a crime, though it ought to arouse suspicion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
axollot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. True but that's why proper investigations need to be performed.
Haliburton was doing similar maintenance August 2009 in the Timor Sea when an explosion caused a similar leak that wasnt repaired for 10 weeks, the damage however, lives on. It reeks of barely legal business practices and it wouldnt be the 1st time Haliburton should have been investigated.
Cheers
Sandy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerpetuallyDazed Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. So, is Boots & Coots involved in this explosion? Googling found this:
Which is true?


From "http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/coal-oil-gas/bp-offshore-oil-rig-explosion">Popular Mechanics": "Blowouts happen four to five times a years," says Bill Markus, vice president of response at the legendary Texas firm of Boots & Coots, "down from 11 to 15 in 2000." Boots & Coots is not working on the Deepwater incident and Markus cautions that he has no specific knowledge of what happened or if it was even a blowout."



From http://news.businessweek.com/article.asp?documentKey=1376-L1NO8Z0YHQ0Y-1">Bloomberg: "Boots & Coots Inc. of Houston and Amarillo, Texas-based GSM Enterprises Inc., two of the companies that extinguished hundreds of oil wells in Kuwait set ablaze by retreating Iraqi troops in 1990, have been brought in to help cap the leaks."


Weird!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. You know, I was wondering if something like this would happen
but I thought 'no that is crazy think, stop'. Halliburton is evil and will fuck the world over if given half a chance (which they proved in Iraq and Afghanistan).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. There's nothing nefarious about it.
The big oilfield service companies (Halliburton, Schlumberger, Weatherford, Baker-Hughes) are always making acquisitions. Look at the acquisitions within the last year. Baker-Hughes bought BJ Services, Schlumberger acquired GeoServices, Weatherford acquired International Logging....what's happenning is that the thinking is eventually an operator (oil company) will eventually bid just one contract to bring a well to completion, from spud to production (rig, geosciences, testing, flow optimization, pipeline downstream), instead of 50 contracts. Turnkey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. “The oil and gas industry is so intimately entwined with the economy of disaster -"
“ – both as a root cause behind many disasters and as a beneficiary from them – that it deserves to treated as an honorary adjunct of the disaster-capitalism complex.”

http://realityzone-realityzone.blogspot.com/2010/04/shock-doctrine-of-disaster-capitalism.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bc3000 Donating Member (766 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. nm
Edited on Sat May-01-10 07:44 PM by bc3000
nevermind

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
24. Good Christ this is almost as stupid as the Freepers saying Obama did it on purpose. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
27. Halliburton is the real-life Sylvester McMonkey McBean
Edited on Sat May-01-10 08:38 PM by RufusTFirefly
It makes money putting on stars. And it makes money taking those stars off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
29. Suuure ..... great theory .......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
30. Since John Wayne - Boots & Coots made no sense as a separate 'private sector' entity...
Since Saddam, how many oil fields have you seen alight by the hundreds & billowing with thick black oil smoke like a Hollywood movie full of oil soaked horses? Boots & Coots makes more sense being sucked up as just another 'asset' by some Byzantine so-called private sector conglomerate 'offering' under one sick, tiny little secret door of an oil soaked tent itself


I like tinfoil as much as anyone else - and as far as tinfoil goes I am able to see the bridge you are building so indeed why? Why not exercise an asset just sitting there. One already paid for. One that could be ticked up, so that the E-Trade babies of the world can have Lindsey over for a glass of cool, drippy milk on the 17th floor overlooking Central Park

And as to whether we *are* talking John Wayne, or no...you'd be hard pressed to find another *that actually thinks that he is* than Dick Cheney of Halliburton. And maybe that is the downside to the coffins we share ~

^

^

^

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Damned Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
32. MULDER! SCULLY!
Got on this!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
35. Anti-conspiracy theorists will say it's just that. Coincidence. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC