chill_wind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-01-10 01:31 AM
Original message |
CNBC POLL: Did Goldman Sachs Do Anything Wrong? |
Lorien
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-01-10 01:33 AM
Response to Original message |
1. 38% think that they did nothing wrong? |
chill_wind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-01-10 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I know. Not even "ethically". |
|
What an internet citizenry.
I don't think the public at large or the 10,000 or so that showed up on Wall Street yesterday would reflect that same percentage. But CNBC will find that useful for something, I'm sure.
|
Amonester
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-01-10 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Maybe that 38% do the same on a daily basis? |
|
Edited on Sat May-01-10 01:53 AM by Amonester
Or they Wish they Could do the same Wrong but they'll Never be able to?
Go figure. That's How Sick They (R).
|
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-01-10 01:48 AM
Response to Original message |
2. They do these polls to get revenue from web ads. |
|
Don't encourage them. The time has long passed to tune out the corporate media.
|
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-01-10 01:51 AM
Response to Original message |
4. HA! I posted a comment stating I can''t believe you don't think |
|
GS did anything wrong. I tried to include THEIR WORDS describing the instruments they were selling but CNBC wuldn't let me do that. I got a message " Apparently yur message contains words hat CNBC considers inappropriate" so I edited it to sh*t and then posted it. Inthe message I alo said if you believe GS did nothing wrong then maybe the crominal isn't them but you!
BTW I voted the top option that what they did was criminal.
|
frylock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-01-10 01:59 AM
Response to Original message |
6. didn't see the "are you fucking shitting me?!!1" option |
chill_wind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-01-10 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
sabrina 1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-01-10 02:14 AM
Response to Original message |
8. I tried, but I couldn't vote for some reason ~ |
Union Yes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-01-10 02:27 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Fucking corporate propagandist pigs. knr. nt |
Taitertots
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-01-10 02:38 AM
Response to Original message |
10. What percentage even knows what a synthetic collateralized debt obligation is? |
|
There is almost no question that what Goldman Sachs did was unethical and illegal. They took a bunch of money and lied about the composition of their CDOs. Anyone who thinks they didn't do anything wrong is an idiot.
|
chill_wind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-01-10 02:38 AM
Response to Original message |
11. I just noticed they have a whole bunch |
|
Edited on Sat May-01-10 02:39 AM by chill_wind
on the right side column of the page.
* o Should the White House Re-think its Position on Off-shore Drilling? o Whom Do You Distrust More, Congress or Wall St.? o Did Goldman Sachs Do Something Wrong? o Would You Buy Goldman Sachs Stock? o Should Marijuana Be Legalized? o Would You Buy a Battery-Powered Car?
68%-- no to rethinking. "no, we should keep on drilling."
:-/
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 10:48 PM
Response to Original message |