Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is it with abortion exceptions for rape?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
glen123098 Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 07:19 PM
Original message
What is it with abortion exceptions for rape?
I noticed that in the recent abortion bill that passed in Florida, they make women pay for an ultrasound before an abortion, unless the woman can prove she was raped. However she proves she was raped is beyond me, but I think these exceptions for rape reveal something of the anti abortion movement. They want to force women to keep the fetus to term as punishment for being a "slut." Certainly if they cared about the rights of the fetus, the rape produced fetus would have equal standing under the law. Is this what everyone thinks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Everyone who has ever spent ten seconds thinking about it agrees with you
Edited on Sat May-01-10 07:22 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
The only reason for the exception is that with the rape/incest exception anti-choice polls pretty well. Without it anti-choice polls very badly.

Simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yup
Edited on Sat May-01-10 07:24 PM by havocmom
Wingers want to control the wimmens. If they can't control, they want to be the ones fucking us. If we choose a different partner, they want to punish us for it.

They think we are property, pure and simple. When we show independence and healthy sense of self, they HAVE to punish us severely. To them, we are utilities, not human beings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hypocrisy thy name is "pro-life"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. These people don't REALLY see fetuses as people.
They seem them as Holy Punishment.

And they think that GAYS are unworthy to raise children. Imagine growing up in a household where you, as a child, are considered to be nothing more than a punishment upon your sinful, wicked parents--a burden to be borne, not a joy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's one of the first things I use to trip up forced birthers.
"Surely you don't believe a woman raped should be *punished* by being forced to carry a pregnancy she doesn't want?

Most of them say - oh no! That's different!

It then becomes very easy to reframe the discussion and get them to admit that they DO think women should be punished with pregnancy - something they most often claim not to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. They act as if there is no recession or housing collapse in FL.
Why they think that we NEED these archaic laws in place to bring us out of a recession and solve our housing crisis is beyond me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. they are being pragmatic
Edited on Sat May-01-10 07:59 PM by dsc
first, it should be noted that some agree with you that it should be all or nothing but that most, including those who legislate, are willing to take a nearly entire loaf instead of none. The fact is that the percentage of abortions coming from rape or incest is very low so they get to ban, or in this case, ultrasound 90% of pregancies by allowing a rape exception when they would likely get 0% if they didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. exactly. i make them tell me they think it is murder. i say, how can they justify murder
Edited on Sat May-01-10 08:06 PM by seabeyond
even if the mother is at risk, or a woman is raped or a 10 yr old is raped by father. it would still be murder. they cannot justify murder. they cannot say some murder is ok and some murder is not. otherwise

it is merely a punishment for a female being "promiscuous".

i have NEVER gotten a reasonable, logical argument when put to them in that manner.

BUT i use that argument always

do not tell me it is murder and then tell me murder is ok sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. If the mother is in danger it would be justifiable homicide
the intent of the actor is irrelevent, it is the danger to the person being protected that matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. self defense? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. basicly
self defense is dependent on the level of threat the person faces not necessarily the intent of the person who is threatening. Two take two examples. A homicidal maniac who has repeatedly threatened you is outside your house with a knife. You open the door and shoot him. In many jurisidictions you have committed a crime. He did intend to kill you but you were under no real threat since he was outside your house and couldn't reach you. Example two, you are asleep in your bed and a drunk man climbs in your window with a knife in his hand thinking he has broken into his own bed room. You reach under your bed and shoot him thinking he was going to kill you. You didn't committ a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. ok dsc... i got it. you are the first to have a logical defense of mothers risk
but i am not gonna just give it to the anti abortionist. they are gonna have to give me the answer thru thougt.

still

the other two would be flat out murder.... per their definition

wink... thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. An excellent point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. Exactly! It reveals many on the "pro-life" (really just pro-birth) side for the hypocrites they are
I actually have more respect for those who don't make that exception than those who do and criminalize all other abortions. At least the ones who don't make the exception actually believe the "murder" BS, as misguided as they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. The idea is "if you don't want to get pregnant, don't have sex" rape is different in that way
It is a refrain used a lot on many different topics ("if you don't want X, don't do Y") but if you are a victim then you did not have a choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. yes, they use that excuse. she did not ask for it. answer. so? murder is murder.
she has to suck it up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. There are a lot of hidden assumptions
in the "pro-life" mindset.

One is that women decide very casually to have abortions, and therefore they must be forced to think it through, really, REALLY think it through to the point of not being able to obtain one. This is because for many men having sex with just any old handy female can (they hope) happen very casually and without much thought.

The other thing that's almost always completely missing from the anti-choice mindset is that you'd think all of the women who every want an abortion for any reason whatsoever did it completely by themselves. There's never any consideration of the man who contributed to the pregnancy, except when a man wants to force the unwilling woman to bear his child. They have no clue whatsoever about what the nine months of pregnancy and then childbirth and then the whole postpartum thing is all about.

My above sweeping generalizations are not to be construed as applying to all men, just to those who mindlessly try to deprive women of control over their own bodies.

Oh. And true "pro-life" proponents would want free healthcare for all, especially pregnant women and their babies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. First Trimester
This bill mandates this for First Timester abortions. They are kidding right? So if a woman if going to be prescribed RU486 for a under 7 weeks EMBRYO, what in the world do they think she will see? In fact, most women would probably be horrified at what an embryo actually looks like. My OB/GYN had pix up in his office of early stages of development. Under a series of picutures was the question, "Which one is the the chicken, the pig, or the human?" It was very difficult to tell.

I did see my ultrasound at 5 weeks (ectopic). I couldn't even SEE the embryo. Certianly, no little head, legs, arms, etc., like they are trying to say.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meldread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. Exactly.
If someone believes that abortion is murder, it doesn't make logical sense to justify murder in the case of rape. After all, it's not the fault of the fetus that its father was a rapist. The same applies to incest.

So yeah. The whole anti-choice argument falls apart the moment they stop being consistent. Either it's murder or it isn't. I'm fairly certain that most of their support would fall away if they had to justify why a thirteen year old girl, who was raped by her father, has to then carry that child to term and give birth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC