Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Washington Post can not tell Obama from Malcolm X

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 10:16 PM
Original message
Washington Post can not tell Obama from Malcolm X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh my. How would that mistake even be made?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. To white folks, black folks are all the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. haha.. right.
and all us Gays act the same and are all flamboyant.

Anyhow, that is clearly not an accident by their stupid paper. They figure they'll get a few hundred subs out of the teabaggers by doing that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Here's a brazillion more hilarious ones...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Morbius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Y'know, if there's a pattern, like at Fox "News" with the Chyron...
...then I'm all for nailing 'em. But I think this was a mistake. Obviously, the Post has egg on their face. I don't think it was deliberate for a couple reasons:

First, everyone on the planet knows what Barack Obama looks like. Everyone. Seriously; he's the biggest "star" the White House has ever had. The media all over the world has adopted him. So, I don't think the claim they "don't know the difference" has any validity whatsoever.

Second, this is a lefty paper, or at least an even-handed one! One of the few left; they'd hardly want to alienate their base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. You might want to read this
Embedded links in the original:
http://climateprogress.org/2010/04/27/one-myth-about-the-washington-post-it-still-practices-serious-journalism/

One myth about the Washington Post: It still practices serious journalism
No myth: Wind power HAS reduced Denmark's CO2 emissions a lot
April 27, 2010

The Washington Post has adopted many strategies to stave off its collapsing circulation. It has, for instance, gone tabloid, repeatedly publishing falsehood-filled op-eds by Sarah Palin, including one on climate science!

It also strains to print an unconventional “contrarian” analysis ever week in its “5 Myths” series, which is supposedly “a challenge to everything you think you know.” Of course, lots of what you know is true, and that means the Post has to print lots of stuff that isn’t.

In its 5 Myths about China’s economic power piece two weeks ago, “Myth” 4 was “China’s hunger for resources is sucking the world dry and making major contributions to global warming.” You may notice something about that myth — it isn’t one. China is making major contributions to global warming. One would have to categorize that as a fact. China is now actually the world’s biggest emitter, which must qualify as a “major” contribution even to the Post.

And the ‘debunking’ asserts, “unlike the United States, China has recognized that it cannot let its fossil-fuel appetite grow forever and is working hard to improve efficiency.” China, like the United States under Obama Administration, is working to improve efficiency, but right now China looks like it plans to keep building one or two coal plants a week for the foreseeable future — whereas U.S. fossil fuel consumption may well have peaked a few years ago and in any case will see little net growth from 2005 through 2020 and probably well beyond that. Indeed, but for a handful of Senators, we’d be on a path to an 80% reduction by 2050.

This Sunday, the Post published its most nonsensical piece in the series, “5 Myths about green energy.“ They farmed out the task to the right wing Manhattan Institute, which, surprise, surprise, has received $800,000 from the big-time polluters at Koch Industries in recent years, on top of money from ExxonMobil. It’s no surprise Big Oil and polluters fund right-wing disinformation. And I suppose it’s no longer a surprise that the Post reprint their misinformation as fact.

I don’t have the time to debunk the entire piece. Fortunately, Matt Wasson Director of Programs for Appalachian Voices, dismantled the first one thoroughly at HuffPost, which I excerpt below:

<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
potsmokinghippie666 Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Pffft!
But they are both evil commie socialists! Besides all of teh colored people are the same.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here's a hint, Obama doesn't wear glasses
What a bunch of idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC