Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BP liability limited to $75 million (with an "m") in economic damages?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 05:20 PM
Original message
BP liability limited to $75 million (with an "m") in economic damages?
Edited on Mon May-03-10 05:50 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
If, after the trust fund is exhausted ($1 billion eligible for this incident) BP will not be liable for economic damages over $75 million then constantly saying BP will pay for all of this is a political exploding cigar. Makes people calmer today at the cost of making them angrier tomorrow. BP does have to pay, but only for cleaning up the oil itself.

But people laid of at fisheries and hotels are going to be the government's look-out, not BP's. Businesses will either go under or be bailed out by the government. State government will lose revenue (and cut services) and BP won't be making up the difference.

If the facts are ugly then just lay out the ugly facts and try to fix blame in advance.

(If anyone knows more or different about the prevailing liability limitation chime in.)


Tax on Oil May Help Pay for Cleanup

WASHINGTON — The federal government has a large rainy day fund on hand to help mitigate the expanding damage on the Gulf Coast, generated by a tax on oil for use in cases like the Deepwater Horizon spill.

Up to $1 billion of the $1.6 billion reserve could be used to compensate for losses from the accident, as much as half of it for what is sometimes a major category of costs: damage to natural resources like fisheries and other wildlife habitats.

Under the law that established the reserve, called the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, the operators of the offshore rig face no more than $75 million in liability for the damages that might be claimed by individuals, companies or the government, although they are responsible for the cost of containing and cleaning up the spill.

The fund was set up by Congress in 1986 but not financed until after the Exxon Valdez ran aground in Alaska in 1989. In exchange for the limits on liability, the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 imposed a tax on oil companies, currently 8 cents for every barrel they produce in this country or import.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/02/us/02liability.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. This could cost BP a kazillion dollars, they'd still pass it on to the consumer somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Somehow, but not 100%
The oil world is far from optimally competitive but it isn't quite a perfect monopoly. BP cannot have higher prices than the other companies without losing some sales volume so their profits would be hurt some by money they have to pay that Exxon or Mobil do not.

Probably not 1:1, but some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PinkFloyd Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. What needs to be done yesterday...
They need to put a plain, simple, short, easy-to-read bill through congress that simply make the oil compnay that occupies the drill site has to pay 100% of the clean up expense, should a disaster occur, regardless of what the disaster is. There should never be a limit on liability on anything, ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. The CEO of BP made a bizarre statement on our TV news in the UK. He said they accept full
Edited on Mon May-03-10 05:46 PM by Joe Chi Minh
responsibility, though they were not the people with "hands on", "in situ" (my words) responsibility, who actually caused it. I suppose he was implying that BP were the prime contractors, so the buck stopped with them. They presumably subcontracted the actual engineering, etc to Halliburton and the other companies. If not, he sounded more like Ghandi or Mother Theresa than Milton Friedman or Lloyd Blanfein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. There's responsibility and then there's re$$$ponsibility
We will see which one they're accepting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. My theory is that BP will try to weasel
by saying the Swiss company they leased the platform from was at fault. I saw the CEO of BP on tonight's news, and he was starting to point the finger that way.

Any effort to tax the entire oil industry is just going to get passed on to consumers. Leaving the liability with BP, and seizing their assets to pay it keeps the rest of us from paying for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Sounds about right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC