Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-04-07 10:41 PM
Original message |
The Many Faces of the GOP Debate |
|
Edited on Fri May-04-07 10:43 PM by Solly Mack
Running on Dust
|
EST
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-04-07 11:08 PM
Response to Original message |
1. And dead dust, at that. |
|
I really like the idea of a poster, earlier today, calling for the impeachment, retroactively, of Raygun and GHW Bush. It is very do-able and would certainly arouse the fighting ire of the goppies. The Raygun administration should have been impeached in 1987 for their own high crimes related to Iran/Contra, not to mention the crimes surrounding the Iran hostage situation and their illegal re-supply of Saddam H.
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-05-07 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
d_b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-04-07 11:12 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Nightmares for me tonight.
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-05-07 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
Swamp Rat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-04-07 11:13 PM
Response to Original message |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-05-07 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
I'm working on more...doing an egg seance :)
|
silverojo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-05-07 01:48 AM
Response to Original message |
4. God knows they can't use Bush's face |
|
28% approval level and dropping...like failure, like son.
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-05-07 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. their choices are a dead man or bush |
|
and a dead man wins out again...Bush and Ashcroft should form a club
|
Philosoraptor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-05-07 07:47 AM
Response to Original message |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-05-07 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. It was the second coming |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:48 AM
Response to Original message |