Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why the Deepwater Horizon Blew Up- Taken from a Driller's Forum

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Merchant Marine Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:45 AM
Original message
Why the Deepwater Horizon Blew Up- Taken from a Driller's Forum
I found this post on a professional drillers' forum, where they are very concerned about the disaster. It should shed some light on the specifics of WHY the rig blew up.

This well had been giving some problems all the way down and was a big discovery. Big pressure, 16ppg+ mud weight. They ran a long string of 7" production casing - not a liner, the confusion arising from the fact that all casing strings on a floating rig are run on drill pipe and hung off on the wellhead on the sea floor, like a "liner". They cemented this casing with lightweight cement containing nitrogen because they were having lost circulation in between the well kicking all the way down.

The calculations and the execution of this kind of a cement job are complex, in order that you neither let the well flow from too little hydrostatic pressure nor break it down and lose the fluid and cement from too much hydrostatic. But you gotta believe BP had 8 or 10 of their best double and triple checking everything.
On the outside of the top joint of casing is a seal assembly - "packoff" - that sets inside the subsea wellhead and seals. This was set and tested to 10,000 psi, OK.

This was the end of the well until testing was to begin at a later time, so a temporary "bridge plug" was run in on drill pipe to set somewhere near the top of the well below 5,000 ft. This is the second barrier, you always have to have 2, and the casing was the first one. It is not know if this was actually set or not. At the same time they took the 16+ ppg mud out of the riser and replaced it with sea water so that they could pull the riser, lay it down, and move off.

When they did this, they of course took away ...... hydrostatic on the well. But this was OK, normal, since the well was plugged both on the inside with the casing and on the outside with the tested packoff. But something turned loose all of a sudden, and the conventional wisdom would be the packoff on the outside of the casing.

Gas and oil rushed up the riser; there was little wind, and a gas cloud got all over the rig. When the main inductions of the engines got a whiff, they ran away and exploded. Blew them right off the rig. This set everything on fire. A similar explosion in the mud pit / mud pump room blew the mud pumps overboard. Another in the mud sack storage room, sited most unfortunately right next to the living quarters, took out all the interior walls where everyone was hanging out having - I am not making this up - a party to celebrate 7 years of accident free work on this rig. 7 BP bigwigs were there visiting from town.

In this sense they were lucky that the only ones lost were the 9 rig crew on the rig floor and 2 mud engineers down on the pits. The furniture and walls trapped some and broke some bones but they all managed to get in the lifeboats with assistance from the others.

The safety shut ins on the BOP were tripped but it is not clear why they did not work. This system has 4 way redundancy; 2 separate hydraulic systems and 2 separate electric systems should be able to operate any of the functions on the stack. They are tested every 14 days, all of them. (there is also a stab on the stack so that an ROV can plug in and operate it, but now it is too late because things are damaged).

The well is flowing through the BOP stack, probably around the outside of the 7" casing. As reported elsewhere, none of the "rams", those being the valves that are suppose to close around the drill pipe and / or shear it right in two and seal on the open hole, are sealing. Up the riser and out some holes in it where it is kinked. A little is coming out of the drill pipe too which is sticking out of the top of the riser and laid out on the ocean floor. The volumes as reported by the media are not correct but who knows exactly how much is coming?

2 relief wells will be drilled but it will take at least 60 days to kill it that way. There is a "deep sea intervention vessel" on the way, I don't know if that means a submarine or not, one would think this is too deep for subs, and it will have special cutting tools to try to cut off the very bottom of the riser on top of the BOP. The area is remarkably free from debris. The rig "Enterprise" is standing by with another BOP stack and a special connector to set down on top of the original one and then close. One unknown is if they get a new stack on it and close it, will the pregnant dog broach around the outside of all the casing??

In order for a disaster of this magnitude to happen, more than one thing has to go wrong, or fail. First, a BallS**tty cement job. The wellhead packoff / seal assembly, while designed to hold the pressure, is just a backup. And finally, the ability to close the well in with the BOP somehow went away.


Taken from http://drillingclub.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=wellcontrol&thread=4837&page=14#13353
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Something that got my attention - does he say the cement job was fubard?
Edited on Tue May-04-10 02:54 AM by Rex
Dammit, people need to stop hiring Halliburton. If what they did to the troops wasn't enough of an indicator, this 'spill' should be a red flag to all future prospects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merchant Marine Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It would appear that a failure in the cement casing occured at the rig's most vulnerable moment
They had replaced the dense drilling mud in the drill pipe with sea-water in preparation to pull the riser and move to a new wellhead. The mud is normally used to maintain hydrostatic control over the wellhead. With only seawater in the pipe their only method of well control was the plug (which failed) and the BOPs (which failed).

This is, ironically, a marine pollution requirement, as the synthetic mud is petroleum-based and just letting it go into the ocean when you pull the riser would raise a huge fine from the USCG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That is ironic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. "Sneer." - xVP Dickie 'Five-Military-Deferments' Cheney (R - Halliburton)
Edited on Tue May-04-10 05:58 AM by SpiralHawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
41. This is not the first time an explosion has occurred after
a Halliburton fix....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Really? We need to add up all the horrible things they have done
to civilian and military people and find a way to put them out of business. No moral compass or work ethic = nobid contracts...not good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. Agreed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
miscsoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. can anyone give us laymen a precis of what the guy is saying?
Edited on Tue May-04-10 03:04 AM by miscsoc
i'm a deskbound student and can make head nor tail of this. don't know a thing about drilling for oil. i'd like to have some idea though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merchant Marine Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Hopefully this diagram will help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
N_E_1 for Tennis Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. This is a easy read, will explain a lot.
This really explained a lot for me, written in lay terms from someone that (it seems) was onboard.

Seems the pressure in the deposit was greater than anyone expected. Although the safety valves were in place checked and working, the pressure just blew them up from the wellhead up to the ship. (Yes, believe it or not the "Deepwater Horizon is/was a ship)

http://www.drillingahead.com/forum/topics/transocean-deepwater-horizon-1

Also more info can be found at:

http://www.theoildrum.com/

They set up a page for people like us that need non-tech explanations.

Good reading to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
miscsoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
45. will peruse this
looks like the sort of thing i was looking for
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. Very good information...
Thanks for posting. Interesting that there was a party celebrating their safety record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. I am going to kick this up later in the morning.
I know people will want to see it and there are a few more DU folks who have some experience working on rigs, I am eager to hear to what they see/say also.

Thanks for posting this, Merchant.
Can you source your pic for us weak eyed old folks? Or make it bigger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. Very Helpful, Sir: Thank You
"The difference between things that can go wrong and things that cannot possibly go wrong is that when things that cannot possibly go wrong go wrong, they are impossible to get at and fix."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Is that you Mr. Rumsfeld?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. The Late, Much Lamented Mr. D. Adams, Actually, Sir....
Though my resollection of the quote is probably not completely accurate, it does convey the gist of what lay behind a galaxy-wide revolution occasioned by the failure of air-conditioning systems that could not possibly go wrong....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. I am curious about this comment
But you gotta believe BP had 8 or 10 of their best double and triple checking everything.
---------------
Didn't the BP CEO say that it was not their rig; it was not their accident and Transocean was operating the rig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazylikafox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
35. yep, he sure did say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. thank you for posting this n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. I have seen electrical crews compress lugs onto that rather large
cable on high tension lines with a spiral explosive. You wouldn't believe how it works... this was 15 years ago or so... if I remember correctly it was a spiral charge that was placed around the lug and when it was set off, there was little or no air gap inside the perhaps 2 inch thick aluminum cable and or the lug... seems to me that if you cannot get your rams to close or whatever and you need to pinch something off in a hurry... well you get the drift. Some will say it will cut the pipe.. maybe, maybe not. If you put a gradually smaller diameter of charge towards the end of the spiral at each end, the result should/could come out a bottle necked pinch... I would like to see this "tool" investigated/developed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
12. And then there's Methane hydrate.....
A publicly available Halliburton PowerPoint presentation from last November might tell us a lot about what could have caused the oil blowout, fire and massive oil gushing at the Horizon rig.

Suppose you’re that division of Halliburton that has the dangerous job of "cementing" the drilling hole and the gaps between the hole and pipe. You’ve done this lots of times in shallow water wells, but you’ve learned through previous experience in deep water there’s a particularly difficult problem having to do with the presence of gas that has seeped to the ocean floor and been captured in essentially "frozen" crystallized formations.

The problem is that when you drill into these formations, and then try to inject cement into the hole/gaps to prevent leakage, the curing process for that creates heat. That heat can, if not controlled, cause the gas to escape the frozen crystals. If a lot of gas is released all at once, as could happen during the cement/curing process, it can cause a blowout where the cementing is occurring, or force gas and/or oil up the pipeline to the drilling rig on the surface. And the heat created by the process may be just enough to ignite the gas , causing the explosion and fire.

Did this happen at the Horizon rig? And if Halliburton already knew about this problem months (years) ago, and knew the risks it might create, why are we just now learning about this?

...

http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/44349

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. Sounds like this is close to what I understand that happened
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Sure does. Here's a witness report:
...

In this case obviously too much gas got in.

Correct. And this well had not a bad history of producing lots of gas. It was touch and go a few times, but it's just not terribly uncommon, you're almost always going to get gas back from a well. We have systems to deal with the gas...


So what may of happened here?


The sheer volume and pressure of gas that hit all at once was more than the safeties and controls we had in place could handle.



...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8270273
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
39. From what I understand, they use quick-cure cement to save money.
The quicker the cement cures the more the temperature rise and the greater the risk of this kind of disaster. They used the quick-cure stuff because it was costing a half-million a day for the rig and they would rather move on than wait a week or two for slow-setting stuff to cure.

Does anyone know if this is true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nenagh Donating Member (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
14. Thank you
The Oil Drum site also has technical info
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlipperySlope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. Thanks for the excellent post (and link).
This is good information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
17. Thanks for the info
Everybody's been so fixated on the spill damage, no one's talked about what might have caused the explosion in the first place.


KnR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
18. That BallSh**ty cement job leads right back to Haliburton...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
19. kick for later
i still don't fully understand, but this does help...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
20. Thank you for that. It demonstrates the root cause of all of these kinds of events.
When cost-cutting and profits become more important than quality and craftsmanship, disaster will be the result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DatManFromNawlins Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
37. You don't know that to be true
People out on those rigs do very dangerous jobs and take things very seriously. That rig's BOP was checked every 5 days and the entire rig had undergone a safety inspection the week prior. I work for a publishing company which is heavily covering this story, and from what I've been told, there's no single thing that can be pointed to as the cause of the failure. Halliburton and BP just happen to be convenient scapegoats for those who are willing to shut off the thinking parts of their brain and just point fingers and hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. Well, they both have horrendous records
and both were there, so it doesn't take much thinking to at least wonder what they might have had to with this latest disaster.

If you know something that gets them off the hook for this particular disaster, then post it.

Meantime:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BP#Accidents

BP was named by Mother Jones Magazine as one of the "ten worst corporations" in both 2001 and 2005 based on its environmental and human rights records.<58><59> In 1991 BP was cited as the most polluting company in the US based on EPA toxic release data. BP has been charged with burning polluted gases at its Ohio refinery (for which it was fined $1.7 million), and in July 2000 BP paid a $10 million fine to the EPA for its management of its US refineries.<60> According to PIRG research, between January 1997 and March 1998, BP was responsible for 104 oil spills.<61> BP patented the Dracone Barge to aid in oil spill clean-ups across the world. <62>


And Halliburton's record of failures is not hard to find. Both Corporations have been accused of cost-cutting on safety measures numerous times, BP just recently.

We are free to speculate given the information available, that it would not be beyond the realm of possibility considering their records, that both these Corporations, both big donors to both political parties, share at least some of the blame for this disaster. Iow, right now, absent any other information, they would be at the top of the list of suspects.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
21. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merchant Marine Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
25. Bump for the morning crowd...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, Merchant Marine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
28. Good thread, the earlier one of the crew member being interviewed very informative as well..
I think many on DU need to try to understand the mechanics more in order to deal with it all and threads like this one help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
29. Thanks! Very helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
30. Rec. So this was a screw up, not really a failure of equipment - a bad installation?
Very ironic about the 7 year safety party.....


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Not alone, the screw up was the failure to realize that the equipment
was ill equipped to handle the pressure of the first blow out of gasses that ignited on the floor...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
31. What about this lack of a $500,000 remote switch we hear about? Was it an issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Well from what I have heard through the oilfield grapevine is that they did have a fail safe remote
but the blast of gasses that ignited the firestorm shocked too many into immediately using this fail safe from the floor, when they did, it was too late, some believe that something broke off down under when the first blow out occurred with such force and that a broken tool or piece of the equipment broke off and jammed the preventers from closing, something like that..I was listening in...in real life by the way, perhaps I did not listen close enough to repeat word for word. Sorry but I know only what I listen in on..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lavender Blue Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Your remote won't change the channel on the TV if the TV's broke.
It's kinda like that..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. Reading more about it, the acoustic remote is for triggering the BOP from a lifeboat.
It's if other communications are cut and it seems they were able to try to trigger the BOP but it didn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lavender Blue Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
34. That's the big unknown, how much integrity is in the seal between the casing and the crumbling hole.
It won't do much good to choke off the casing and drillstem if the stuff is coming up outside them.
Whoever wrote this knows what he's talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
40. "more than one thing has to go wrong"
Maybe it's just me, but I'm beginning to think this is one of the things wrong with the Corporate Thinking with multiple redundancy. The whole purpose of having mulitply redundant safeguard systems is because of "Murphy's Law". No matter how well you design a system, eventually the worst will happen. So, we design backup systems for when Murphy's Law occurs.

When a Corporation wants to "cut costs", well, they cut costs in the safety systems because - after all - if one of them fails one of the redundant systems should kick in.

But, if they cut costs on all the primary and back-up systems, then they will all fail. Just as it appears happened here.

Tell me again how the Free Market is better and more efficient than the Government?

Of course, the Government failed us here, too. They should have properly inspected all of the safeguards. Anoter example of how proper regulations can avoid disaster and help both common people and corporations. If the rig had been properly regulated, then BP wouldn't have to be paying to fix it.

That's just from a purely financial point of view. The environmental impact can't be measured in dollars and cents.

Thank you, deregulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hankthecrank Donating Member (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
44. Sounds with that much pressure the cement dome thingy isn't going to work
Edited on Wed May-05-10 07:20 PM by hankthecrank
Doesn't sound good for getting the oil to stop leakin


Sounds like they need a way of checking pressure before they tap it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC