Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lookie lookie - who the heck just crawled out of the oil swill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 06:44 AM
Original message
Lookie lookie - who the heck just crawled out of the oil swill
http://www.newser.com/story/87718/bushs-brownie-obama-wanted-spill-to-spread.html
<snip>
Brown—whose handling of Hurricane Katrina's aftermath won praise from few apart from President Bush—says that Obama waited for the oil spill to worsen so he could shut down offshore drilling, the Huffington Post reports.

"This is exactly what they want, because now he can pander to the environmentalists and say, 'I'm gonna shut it down because it's too dangerous,'" Brown told Fox's Neil Cavuto. "This president has never supported Big Oil, he's never supported offshore drilling, and now he has an excuse to shut it back down."
----------------
There are no words for these morons but the defenders of big oil are showing up like dead fish on the beaches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like Brownie is interviewing for a job as Big Oil flack
with that brown ring around his nose, I'm sure he'll do well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Who is this flack on defending this crap
and comparing it to deaths on the space shuttle.
This disaster has deaths and decades of environmental consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I agree
It's a horrible disaster, and the usual gang of suspects are out there shilling for Big Oil and the status quo.

And as usual, the populace at large is being distracted from the magnitude of the disaster by flacks like Brownie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. When you lie down with dogs, you get fleas.
Obama said yes to more exploration, which would lead a reasonable person to believe there would in the future be more drilling.

Now if he flips, he looks weak and unprincipled. If he doesn't we got bad unprincipled bad policy.

Yippeeeee.. Yay for bi-partisan triangulation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. May get lucky on this one
You've got Crist, and several other coastal govenors that aren't gonna be "full throated" advocates of drilling at this point. I can't see "drill baby drill" being a big winner on the fall campaign trail. He can probably back away from this one and no one will be in a particular position to make any hay over it. His bigger problem is that he was using the issue to try to bring the GOP on board. They don't have to say why, but if it isn't in there, they'll probably feel free to actively oppose it, as compared to just making alot of noise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Shut Up Brownie...
No one needs to hear from your sorry ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. And Brownie is some expert on what exactly?
There just aren't any words...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. That's the new talking point of the r/w, compliments of rushbo, perino, et al.,...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chillspike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. LOL Wrong!
Obama could have "shut it down" by just not including oil development in his bill.

Guess that shuts down Brown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. Doesn't He Have Some Horseshit To Shovel?
He's sooooooooo good at it. First, his inept handling during Katrina that led to 1,500 or more deaths. When he was scapegoated, this opportunist and bullshit artist became a corporate media darling in joining the chorus of critism of the booosh regime...always avoiding his own culpability in what happened. So in their lazy reporting on this issue they had to drag this loser back out and somehow he's trying, once again, to shirk any responsibility he had to the Katrina tragedy and try to get back in the good graces of his rushpublican puppetmasters.

Heck of a job, Brownie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. BP Oil Slick The Result Of Republican DOJ And Regulatory Policy

By: bmaz Monday May 3, 2010 7:23 pm
The economic and environmental damage resulting from the exploding fireball compromise of the Deepwater Horizon oil platform may be unprecedented, with the potential to emit the equivalent of up to four Exxon Valdez breakups per week with no good plan to stop it. There will be plenty of finger pointing among BP, Transocean and Halliburton, while it appears the bought and paid for corporatist Congress put the screws to the individual citizens and small businesses by drastically limiting their potential for economic recovery; all in the course of insuring big oil producers like BP have effectively no damage liability for such losses.

How did this happen? There are, of course, a lot of pertinent factors but, by far, the one constant theme underlying all is the mendacious corporate servitude of the Republican party, their leaders and policies. The arrogance and recklessness of BP and its oily partners gestated wildly under the Bush/Cheney administration.

Until the turn of the decade, BP had a relatively decent safety and environmental record compared to others similarly situated. Then BP merged with American oil giant Amoco and started plying the soft regulated underbelly of Republican rule in the US under oil men George Bush and Dick Cheney. Here from the Project On Government Oversight (POGO) is an excellent list of BP misconduct, almost all occurring and/or whitewashed under the Bush/Cheney Administration. If you open the door, foxes eat the chickens.

But it is not just regulatory policy behind the open and notorious recklessness of BP and its ilk, it is intentional policy at the Department of Justice as well. Here is how the former Special Agent In Charge for the EPA Criminal Investigative Division, Scott West, described the DOJ coddling of BP under the Bush/Cheney Administration:http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. That's one heckuva theory there, Brownie.
But, as my Daddy would have said - really sung:

What's the color of horse shit? Brown, Brown, Brown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. This sort of talk is exactly the same as calling Obama a traitor. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
13. Did he go buy a new shirt at Nordstrom's for the interview?
You can quit now, Brownie. You can go home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. well heckofafuckup brownie has all the credibility of a gnat
no offense to gnats intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
15. "This is exactly what they want"
No this is exactly what "they" didn't want but warned would happen. It is however exactly what the right said would never happen.

Go back to judging horse's asses Brownie. That seems to be all you're good for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
16. Apparently he thinks the president's job is to ...
... "support Big Oil". I wonder where he got that idea. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
17. "Obama waited for the oil spill to worsen" before doing what, exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
19. Idiot! Obama already pandered to the rabid right...
...when he put more offshore drilling into his energy plan.

Oops.

If this was all part of a big plan, somehow I don't see him doing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
20. Of all the people that should never open their mouth about ANYTHING....... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC