|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
B2G (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 01:50 PM Original message |
Question on the oil containment devices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. No idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
2. They be sunken over them, pipes will nestle into notches in the sides of vessels. VIDEO: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 02:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Very informative. Thank you! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
3. The are essentially setting a box over top of the open pipe. Then they will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 02:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Containment vessels expected to contain 85% if they work at all... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 02:07 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. The containment systems I design catch 105%. Of course I'm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SPedigrees (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
5. I don't know. It does seem that smooshing down the pipe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 02:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. No way. Not with the pressures involved. You can press down a garden hose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SPedigrees (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 02:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. So what was the talk about concrete? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-04-10 02:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. I believe so. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SPedigrees (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-05-10 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
11. Now they are talking about a "giant dome" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC