Dark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-05-10 08:43 AM
Original message |
DU This poll. It's getting freeped. |
DrDan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-05-10 08:46 AM
Response to Original message |
1. not sure why anyone would object to this - it states "civil unions" - not marriage |
Deep13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-05-10 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Like us, the RWers know it is the same thing. nt |
Dark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-05-10 08:48 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Cause the freepers are messing with it. They won't be happy til GLBT folkare rounded up and locked |
|
Edited on Wed May-05-10 08:49 AM by Dark
in the closet.
On edit: Meant to reply to post #1
|
Xenotime
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-05-10 09:15 AM
Response to Original message |
4. It's not being hit hard enough by our side. |
muffin1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-05-10 09:19 AM
Response to Original message |
5. I voted yes, but I wanted to vote no... |
|
because GLBTers should not have to settle for civil unions. That is not equality.
|
NoSheep
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-05-10 09:21 AM
Response to Original message |
elocs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-05-10 09:22 AM
Response to Original message |
7. If it needs to be DUed or is being freeped it is not a legitimate poll. |
|
Can anyone imagine Gallup trying to pass this off as a meaningful poll? :shrug:
|
Ian David
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-05-10 09:34 AM
Response to Original message |
|
# A) Yes - 32.6%
# B) No - 67.4%
|
yellowcanine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-05-10 10:39 AM
Response to Original message |
9. I would like to see the bill's actual language. Looks to me like the question was framed for a "no" |
|
vote. Does the bill say ANY two consenting adults? I doubt it.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |