Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawmakers admit $10 billion oil liability cap may not be enough to cover spills

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 05:54 PM
Original message
Lawmakers admit $10 billion oil liability cap may not be enough to cover spills

Lawmakers admit $10 billion oil liability cap may not be enough to cover spills
By Jared Allen - 05/06/10 05:52 PM ET


Key lawmakers on Thursday acknowledged that their proposal to increase to $10 billion the liability cap on companies responsible for offshore spills may not go far enough to ensure that BP bears the full cost of economic damages.

Calling a $10 billion liability cap "much more appropriate" than the current $75 million ceiling, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday left open the possibility that the figure could be revised upward as committees begin pouring over the legislative proposal to modify the cap.

"This spill can do great ecological damage to the Gulf States and, of course, it affects fisheries industry, tourism and the rest, and this $10 billion goes a long way to addressing that," Pelosi said during her weekly press conference. "Depending on how many incidents are involved in this particular – these particular – spills, it may be more than one $10 billion liability, but you will be hearing more about that as the committees take that up."

more...

http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/96553-lawmakers-admit-10-billion-oil-liability-cap-may-be-too-low
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kicked and recommended. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wait a minute, let's ask our friends at the oil companies what to do...
After all, they are the experts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. The understatement of the decade
It's the same nonsensical thinking that requires only a $5k liability on auto insurance out here in CA..where a bent fender can cost $1k or more..

our back window in our old car got stuck in the "down" position... cost $675.00..to fix it :grr:

Energy companies should be owned & operated by our federal government, and the "product" sold to corporations that need it to make their products.. At least 1/3 of the profit should be held in reserve to cover environmental damages resulting from the extraction, processing, disposal, etc

Another 1/3 should be set aside for the health & welfare of the workers who endanger their lives to GET the "stuff" out of the ground.


It should not be a for-profit enterprise, since it's something we ALL use and need.

Coal
Oil
Gas
Solar development/distribution
wind development/distribution

The oily guys could still stay in business, but as contractors.....and with strict regulation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teka Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why ANY cap?
Make them pay the full charge, plus a 150% penalty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Any cap on liability on anything
is a clear violation of the VII Amendment to the Constitution. These laws are always passed to protect corporations and never individuals.

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC