Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Really?? Someone with fat fingers and one keystroke brought the NYSE to near panic??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 07:54 AM
Original message
Really?? Someone with fat fingers and one keystroke brought the NYSE to near panic??
In a matter of a few minutes??? Color me astounded. Also sceptical.

I would sooner think someone had an agenda.


http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64631Y20100507

The slide, which in one 10-minute stretch knocked the index down nearly 700 points, may have been triggered by a trading error. Major stock indexes eventually recovered from their 9 percent drops to close down a little more than 3 percent.

But the follow-through selling that pushed stocks of some highly regarded companies into tailspins exacerbated concerns that regulators can quickly lose control of the markets in a world of algorithmic trading.

(snip)

One NYSE employee leaving the Big Board's headquarters in lower Manhattan said the P&G share plunge lay at the center of whatever happened.

"I'll give you a tip," the employee said, speaking on condition of anonymity. "P&G. Check out the low sale of the day. Something screwed up with the system. It traded down $30 at one point."

(snip)

"It validates the decision to offer a hybrid market here where there's a human component married with the electronic," Louis Pastina, executive vice president of NYSE Operations told Reuters in an interview.

The NYSE's rivals advertise lower prices or faster transaction speeds.



http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64631Y20100507

(snip)

Kaufman and Senator Mark Warner -- both Democrats -- said Congress needs to investigate the plunge, which at its deepest point wiped nearly $1 trillion off equity values.

And a House panel has slated a hearing on the causes for the market swoon for next Tuesday, with its chairman, Rep. Paul Kanjorski, urging the SEC to investigate as well.

The scary afternoon in markets came at a bad time for Wall Street, already reeling from accusations that it is a rigged casino -- a criticism stoked by recent civil fraud allegations against Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

The industry has been trying to stave off the Obama administration's calls for tough financial regulation, and the sell-off came as the Senate turned back a Republican effort to weaken a plan to set up a financial consumer watchdog.

(end snips)

So, somebody with fat fingers, or someone with a fat head and a fatter wallet?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Computer trading would have done it
Computer programs will sell stocks if they go below a certain price to protect against a loss. When the price drops trigger more sell orders, it will create a chain reaction in selling across the board. Fears about Greece would have also caused traders to panic and sell into the drop off too.

Once people realized that is was a mistake, the prices rose back to their normal levels in a matter of minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Here is a pic of the alleged fat fingered bankster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. That figures: a guy in a suit! (Why DID a caveman wear a tie anyway?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melm00se Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Fred
was certainly NOT a suit...he was a blue collar crane operator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Always blame the little guy! It's the American way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Fred may have been "blue collar" but he always wore a tie. (I was being facetious BTW)
Edited on Fri May-07-10 09:47 AM by FailureToCommunicate
Of course Fred was also "Green Collar": He operated a crane that didn't pollute -other than dinosaur poop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. that's a theory. what's scary is that they don't really know what happened
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. They can't trace it back to one fat finger?
Bizarre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. I used to post trades to the Italian exchange
some years ago for a multi-national, and they were unregulated posts in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Because the Italian market did not have a daily "close" at the time, a single digit slip going into billions could easily have given the Italian market a death-blow stroke, followed almost instantly by the Euro crashing and bleed out into other non-domestic markets well before any form of correction could take effect.

It's really dismaying how few REAL controls there are in manual market trading and what extraordinary consequences can follow from a stupid keyboard error, but I'm telling you it is certainly possible.

Don't know if I believe this particular story however, it seems a bit too well detailed on short notice. I think something more serious happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. dupe delete
Edited on Fri May-07-10 08:05 AM by sui generis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. As someone who has worked in IT on Wall Street, I can believe it.
It would scare the hell out of most people to realize the crappy technical infrastructure supporting world commerce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
27. I would love to hear more about it. Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. good gosh you should have heard the Nasdaq guy
Trying to defend this :rofl:

"The NYSE FAILED because it FAILED to create a market for ninety seconds. We did our job because there was not one second that the laws of supply and demand didn't work, and there was no break in our creating a market."

Batshit crazy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. My guess is that whoever profited from this "mistake" will try
their damnedest to see that this "mistake" occurs again and again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. The persons making the mistake were the ones who sold off P&G and Accenture
at insanely low prices. They sold it all the way day. Essentially trying to sell couple billion dollars worth of stock @ market all at once.

So the people making the mistake lost a massive amount of money.
The winners were people in right place right time.

For example: someone who like P&G for example but didn't want to pay $60+ had a long term limit order to buy 100 shares @ say $55.

That order executed. As did another one @ $55 and another couple thousand shares to another person @ $54.90 and all the way down into the $40s before they caught the mistake.

I doubt any broker will try the strategy of handing over billions of dollars in stock to third parties in the future.

However it will happen again because the markets are too fast. To much computer control, too many decisions made in milliseconds, and no safeguards to slow it down when these trading programs run amuk.

Saying someone will intentionally do this again is like saying BP will intentionally destroy another oil well because the recovery crews are making so much money working overtime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. in the end, none of the traders in that time span won or lost
They've cancelled every trade that happened in that crazy time frame. So the people who bought $100 of Accenture at $0.01/share and watched their fortunes skyrocket as it recovered to it's original price...had a nice roller coaster ride, and in the end were handed back their $100.

Overall, still a loss because it scared the bejeezus out of so many...and maybe woke a few people up to the insanity that is the financial system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. They only canceled the trades that went over 60% from the starting price
Most of the trades went through, just not the extreme $0.01 ones
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Most of the trades were busted but that wasn't really the point...
Edited on Fri May-07-10 08:48 AM by Statistical
However it isn't like whoever fucked up and tried so sell 40 billion dollars worth of Accenture either wanted to do that or had a method to profit from it.

The people thinking some broker did this on purpose are silly. The broker making the mistake was on the losing side of the trades and lost (or would have lost if they hadn't been busted) billions.

We need real reform on wall street and that should include limits on money flow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Could it have been a warning shot to Congress, busy with reform?
Sorta like: fuck with the Street and the Bankers and we will fuck you up bad - see how fast a fall can be set off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. that thought scares me. nt.
:(


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #17
28. Are you old enough to remember the 'duck & cover' drills in school back in the day
world leaders played nuclear brinkmanship? I think corporations are doing something similar.

Wars are now between multi-national corporate giants, not leaders of nations. The news just isn't reporting much about war anymore. Not even the wars that diverted us from the real threats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. Put the Duke brothers' seat on the exchange up for sale
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
25. OT - but my favorite movie line....
Mortimer Duke: We seem to be paying our employees an awful lot of money.
Lewis Winthorp III: No getting around the old minimum wage, Mortimer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. "I was Agent Orange" eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
14. Yeah right...and i have dead birds and dead fish on my beach and Oil in my water for you..cheap! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
21. I don't believe it either...
...and here's why: (1) if indeed the person typed "b" instead of "m", the keys aren't next to one another on the keyboard so it's almost like you'd have to try to make the error; (2) if they typed in a numeric value, then it's easy to see how ONE extra zero could be added accidentally -- but THREE extra zeroes, by accident? I don't think so.

Also there is the symptoms. You had some stocks going down to $.01/share or even $0. You had other stocks going up to $100,000/share. While most stocks just reflected the overall market slide. I dunno, while I can see big swings overall, it makes no sense that only some stocks would have these wild plunges and rises.

Finally: if someone's fat fingers caused this, then one has to question the overall system. First, why didn't the system recognize and flag a trade that was far outside normal bounds, and require confirmation of the trade before putting it through? Second, if certain individual stocks sunk to $.0 while others rose to $100,000 as a result of an input error, then there are some serious bugs to track down.

The explanations don't jibe. This does not inspire confidence; rather it makes the market look more like a casino operation than ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
23. Clearly it was President Obama.
He did it. It was all his fault.

Anyone who disagrees with me is a DLC sellout and a corporate tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
24. whatta buncha hooey
but a lot of people will buy it...

Creative damage control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
26. Happens to me at the ATM all of the time...

...and it takes a while to re-deposit 100 million dollars in twenty-dollar bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
29. It's the computers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC