Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democracy Now! journalists sue police, Secret Service over ‘violent’ RNC arrests

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 03:20 PM
Original message
Democracy Now! journalists sue police, Secret Service over ‘violent’ RNC arrests
By Stephen C. Webster



For what she called her "violent" arrest outside the 2008 Republican National Convention (RNC), journalist and author Amy Goodman has joined with The Center for Constitutional Rights in filing a federal lawsuit against police and the Secret Service, issuing a stark challenge to policies governing their treatment of protesters.

Goodman said her producers Sharif Abdel Kouddous and Nicole Salazar were injured as police took them to the ground, with Salazar's nose bloodied and Kouddous's arm severely twisted. The whole time, they were demanding police not place them under arrest, shouting "Press! Press!" and waiving their media badges.

Instead, Goodman told RAW STORY during a Thursday conference call that unnamed Secret Service agents "ripped the credentials from around our necks" and police removed the batteries from their cameras, "which makes it very clear what they were after."

The YouTube video of Goodman's arrest quickly became the most popular clip on the site in the 2008 RNC's first days.

"I think that's what freed us after a number of hours," she told reporters.

"Goodman v. St. Paul seeks compensation and an injunction against law enforcement’s unjustified encroachment on First Amendment rights, including freedom of the press and the independence of the media," The Center for Constitutional Rights summarized in an advisory.

"Attorneys say the government cannot limit journalists’ right to cover matters of public concern by requiring that they present a particular perspective; for instance, the government cannot require journalists to “embed” with state authorities," they continued. "Goodman further asserts that the government cannot, in the name of security, limit the flow of information by acting unwarrantedly against journalists who report on speech protected by the First Amendment, such as dissent, and the public acts of law enforcement."


http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0506/democracy-journalists-sue-police-secret-service-violent-rnc-2008-arrests/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. The M$M is already 'inbed' with the Gummit.
Teabaggers get the royal treatment carrying their little pistols around in protest; RNC protestors get the facist treatment of a lifetime for having cameras and webphones go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hope they collect a mint. Who's their lawyer?
This story should be all over the news media. More still, the stuff Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez report should be.

When my local NPR affiliate dropped their show, I stopped sending them money during their incessant pledge drives. Now, I send my support directly to DemocracyNow.org.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. And this:
"Police arrested http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/02/rnc.security/index.html">283 people during the RNC's opening day and had in the weeks prior been engaging in targeted harassment of activists. Over 800 arrests were made during the convention. The New York Times noted that an estimated 50 of those detained were journalists."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. So glad that "violent" is in scare quotes!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah, I found that a tad odd, myself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Honestly I don't think it's scare quotes...
...I think it is a literal quote and was meant to convey that the suit specifically uses the terminology.

JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Yes. Quotes are always "scary". I'm decorating my house with them next Halloween.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Go, Amy!
lol

:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. Bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kievan Rus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. They ought to sue over the Pittsburgh G-20 also
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC