I'm sure you've seen this quote from the decision but the whole read is very interesting. The gay couple trying to adopt, (foster children who had been with them for four years, brothers who the "got" at ages 4 years and 4 months), their witnesses and the state's witnesses attempting to uphold a ban against adoption by gays.
"Dr. Rekers' testimony was far from a neutral and unbiased recitation of the relevant scientific evidence. Dr. Rekers' beliefs are motivated by his strong ideological and theological convictions that are not consistent with the science. Based on his testimony and demeanor at trial, the court can not consider his testimony to be credible nor worthy of forming the basis of public policy."
Read at least the description of Reker's testimony and writings (what a nut case) and his side kick, another nut named Schumm, which is about 1/3 of the way down the page.
Oh, and read the first few paragraphs about the what the two boys were like when the Petitioner became a foster parent and the bottom line (by the Judge) at the end.
Hopefully this will be a trend setting decision in all states.
http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2010/05/07/rekers-beliefs-no-consistent-with-the-science-rekers-himself-not-credible