|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 06:12 PM Original message |
It was Halliburton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. k&r! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texanwitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. It seems to me that they trying to rush this well into production. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
3. As soon as I read their name on the list of companies involved with the rig, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
4. Hate to keep repeating this RE: Halliburton: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 07:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. So, first they help set the fires, and then make money putting them out...or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 07:06 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. now if they'd just buy a containment company |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
5. Have you seen this powerpoint? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 06:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. No, I had not seen that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 06:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. So, in effect, they KNEW it would not work... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 07:03 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. It sure looks like it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
6. Did you doubt it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
8. April 2009 the Int Dept exempted BP from the Env Impact Study---would have prohibited the project |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
9. I see the barracuda is sticking her big nose into this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
14. BP lied to Haliburton about depth of drilling; told Hal it was 16K ft, but it was >30K ft. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 07:46 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Amborin, thats what I've read as well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 09:23 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Was BP involved in the other Haliburton cement-related oil-rig fire that occured |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 10:57 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. Sure, BP lies they all do, but I bet they run that clunker past their mechanics... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
16. Halliburton is always there, the fuckers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
18. LOVE the title of this article:Deepwater Horizon oil spill: Is this Halliburton's Katrina? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
19. There's the argument against Halliburton thinking that with Dick in the wheelhouse... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 01:01 AM Response to Original message |
21. Maybe this was an intentional accident as if to threaten or like a child having a tantrum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubledamerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 01:29 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Cui bono? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 05:12 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC