|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
scentopine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 10:30 PM Original message |
The oil containmment vessel failed because of hydrates - here is what they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
1. I wish I could pin this post at the top forever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cdsilv (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
2. So we're no smarter than the guys who traded manhattan for a few shiny beads and trinkets.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 02:00 AM Response to Reply #2 |
14. i have been saying for years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
3. Giant K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
4. Methane hydrate crystals: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 10:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Yep... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
global1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 01:44 AM Response to Reply #4 |
13. Can Methane Hydrate Crystals Be An Energy Source?......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 02:05 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. We use that stuff in gas form. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyingfysh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 07:24 AM Response to Reply #13 |
23. it's in chunks all over the ocean floor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 07:29 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. No its not - it can't exist in that condition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 04:59 PM Response to Reply #25 |
52. Um.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 06:02 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. Not so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 01:00 PM Response to Reply #55 |
67. Ah, I see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 04:20 PM Response to Reply #67 |
77. Yep, that's it exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 04:58 PM Response to Reply #13 |
51. Sorta |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
5. A little ironic that melting methane hydrates present a global warming danger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
7. Great thread , Thank You !! And yes indeed many warned that this would not work.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost4words (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 08:02 AM Response to Reply #7 |
26. +1 nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 02:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
42. There are many trolls here at DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
8. Even if they get past the problems with the containment vessels |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strelnikov_ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
9. The plan was a 'pipe in a pipe'. Heated water down through outer casing, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebenaube (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-08-10 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
10. I wish I didn't have to say this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 01:09 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Unleash the Krakken? What if you blow a giant hole in the seabed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 01:41 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Nukes aren't necessary... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northernlights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 08:31 AM Response to Reply #12 |
27. thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 03:53 PM Response to Reply #12 |
46. But, but I saw them do it in a movie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 03:16 AM Response to Reply #10 |
17. That is the worst idea I've heard people passing around this board. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 04:57 AM Response to Reply #10 |
21. Would a bunker buster, or several work here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyingfysh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 07:25 AM Response to Reply #10 |
24. the Russians claim to have done it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:56 AM Response to Reply #10 |
31. What happens if it just makes the hole bigger? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whopis01 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:02 PM Response to Reply #31 |
63. not more - just bigger ones. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipfilter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 03:02 PM Response to Reply #31 |
70. Then we can try again in 100,000 years when it's safe to go back there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 03:10 AM Response to Original message |
16. Does anyone have a better suggestion than the containment vessel? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 04:53 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. The techniques that are known to work take too long. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:49 AM Response to Reply #20 |
36. Thanks for the clear explanations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paparush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 06:45 PM Response to Reply #20 |
57. That is..if the relief well is built better than the original well. I guess they won't cut corners |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greiner3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 07:17 PM Response to Reply #16 |
59. "Does anyone have a better suggestion than the containment vessel?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chisox08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:22 PM Response to Reply #59 |
64. Can you shoot the bankers down there too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tango-tee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 03:35 AM Response to Original message |
18. K&R for a great OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 04:24 AM Response to Original message |
19. K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:40 AM Response to Original message |
22. Kicking for the good information. It's a pity that our media don't think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Myrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
28. ... BP and all their 'scientists' didn't know about this possibility? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
29. K&R for good information... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrightKnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:25 PM Response to Reply #29 |
61. Some kind of controlled exothermic reaction around the device |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
30. The true cost of a Chevy Suburban is now known. A trillion dollar war, a million lives, and the Gulf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:01 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Do you think these big honking Toyota SUVs run on wind power? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capitalocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 01:52 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. Some of them roll over on wind power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:32 PM Response to Reply #32 |
53. Far from it. But are you saying they're desirable? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
33. "The true price of a Chevy Suburban..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duchess (121 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:19 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. You forgot stupid... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
34. A little perspective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geckosfeet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
38. And my guess is that this is what caused the initial explosion. The dangers were known. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 02:32 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. "the dangers were known" sounds like criminal negligence to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 02:36 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. It's become the leading theory as to the cause of the initial explosion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
39. We're not smart or wise, we are clever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
43. I think this is America's Chernobyl. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liam_laddie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 03:22 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. The words "think" and "teabaggers" in same sentence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 04:40 PM Response to Reply #44 |
50. delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 04:36 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. I meant think in the gerbil-sniff sense of the word. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
icee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 05:55 PM Response to Reply #43 |
54. I think this is the end. When I said that Iraq was the US's Parthia I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 06:31 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. You're so right. Who would have thought it would be something so low tech/old world? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
icee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 07:00 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. I'm simply repeating what my Ouija board told me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 01:11 PM Response to Reply #56 |
68. i'm in knots over it slipping into the Gulf Stream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 02:52 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Of course that could happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piedmont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 03:29 PM Response to Reply #56 |
71. Jesus, it's like no one's ever heard of the biggest blowout ever, also in the Gulf of Mexico... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caseymoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:15 PM Response to Reply #71 |
78. But what if BP is lying to us and the spill is more like this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earcandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
45. "Shiny Objects" blind your eyes... a catchy tune! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
47. Kicked and recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
48. K&R. Except this "destructive human activity" has a name: capitalism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 08:22 PM Response to Reply #48 |
60. Thank you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piedmont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 03:46 PM Response to Reply #48 |
72. Yes, it could be done by a nationalized company and spill much more. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:25 PM Response to Reply #48 |
79. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jokinomx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
62. "The true cost of a Chevy Suburban is now known." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-09-10 10:31 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Actually, it's a cute oversimplification. "The true cost of a Honda Accord is now known" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scentopine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 12:06 AM Response to Reply #65 |
66. For me, the Suburban marks a special trajectory in American history... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kalyke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 03:51 PM Response to Reply #66 |
73. Not true with Ford, however. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piedmont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 04:01 PM Response to Reply #66 |
76. '68 Charger: 8-10 mpg. '70 Chevelle: 13-16 mpg. '69 GTO: 12-14 mpg |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
74. Think the new smaller dome has a chance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greencharlie (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
75. one failed idea down... time to DRILL the relief well! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:15 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC