Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Robert Bennett lost?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 03:05 AM
Original message
Why Robert Bennett lost?
Edited on Sun May-09-10 03:10 AM by kentuck
Senator Robert Bennett (R) UT, became the first incumbent to be defeated this year. Some are speculating that this may not be an anti-Democratic year as much as it might be an anti-incumbent year? Charlie Crist, a very popular Governor in FL, had to drop out of his Party because his base was so angry with him. He is now running as an Independent. There is even a rumor that Charles Grassley, (R) IA, might also be in a little trouble in his primary?

Although the Republicans expect to do very well in the House, it appears they will be lucky to break even in the Senate.

This is not a typical political year. Anyone that counts their chickens before they hatch may end up with very few eggs in their nest? It's six months to the elections. A lot can happen in six months.


.
Related story:

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-utah-20100508,0,3710088.story



.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe it's not so much an anti-incumbent year as it is a Media kissing Teabagger ass year!
Edited on Sun May-09-10 03:08 AM by FrenchieCat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I'll say what I've said before
In many states the primaries are not over or are just coming to an end

It's easy to say "I'm not voting for..."
Then reality comes by with a big club and slams you.
The other guy running is insanely dangerous

Suddenly the person you weren't gonna vote for doesn't look as bad.

I'll be more interested in polls about the November elections come the middle of September
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. The GOP is purging moderates
Which is comical, because they aren't even moderate. Any willingness to cooperate with this administration is considered treason by the tea baggers. So Crist, Grassley, Bennett all have to go.

I wonder what happens when Snowe and Collins are up for reelection. Hopefully they get purged in the primary and replaced with tea baggers. The public in Maine will hopefully not elect tea bag republicans with no history in Maine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. The article described the paranoia of the rightwing to a T.
<snip> ...nervous about the direction of the country and the growth and expanded reach of the federal government. "They keep digging their fingers deeper into our lives," he says.

<snip> ...Lee senses a movement afoot. It is an awakening, he suggests, of conservatives who say that government must be rooted more firmly in the Constitution and that lawmakers need to focus less on power, perks and pork-barrel spending.<<

The talking points, looks like the nopers have succeeded in scaring the voters with the big government mantra. And when he uses the 'awakening'....religion rears it's head into the politics. They are fighting themselves and they are fighting the image of Barack Obama as the POTUS. (And another thing, Lee sheepishly admits: A photograph of Bennett grinning alongside Obama at one of the inaugural balls really bothered him. Why did he look so happy?<<)

I think the rightwing is in a flutter and can shred themselves if they try hard enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Breaking even in the Senate (50-50) would be a 9 seat gain for them.
Bob Bennett lost because of the strange way Utah nomintaes its candidates. Their caucus system gives huge weight to a few party activists, who are always much more ideological than the general primary electorate. If Bennett could have made it to the primary, he would have easily won.

The Crist/Rubio fight is a better example (though in that case Crist is no longer very popular and neither is an incumbent Senator).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Apparently he hasn't ruled out a write-in campaign
That was in a Salt Lake Paper
He could win that one as he is more popular with Republicans at large in Utah than the lunatics

I'd laugh myself to the grave if he did and won
Jim DeMint would have failed again in getting his birther, tea-bagging racist the puke nomination
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I don't think the OP meant "break even" in that sense
I interpreted it as meaning, not lose any more seats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. Agree -- it's a volatile scene out there.
I think it would be great news if Roxanne Conlin could win that Senate seat in Iowa. Grassley is a fuddyduddy. He's none too bright and not very helpful on meaningful legislation. I'm really hoping Conlin's star rises.

Bennett is a very conservative three-term Senator. It's going to be a long-term problem for the Republicans if their rabid sub-groups become the status quo in primary states. Maybe Bennett will wage a write-in effort and slice up the GOP vote and a Democrat could slip in. It may not happen but it would serve the Baggers right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. Republicans are realizing that anti-incumbent sentiment cuts both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC